Skip to main content

Class 19: Programming the GIMP Tools

Held: Wednesday, 22 February 2017

We consider another more concrete and more sequential model of image making.

Preliminaries

Overview

  • A new model of image making
  • Coding algorithms for drawing
  • Other useful techniques

Updates

News / Etc.

  • New partners!
  • When doing lab writeups in which you create procedures, please write at least the 4Ps, and preferably the 6Ps.
  • The 6Ps are required on all assignments. If you didn’t write them for assignment 4, submit a revised version today.
  • There has been a request that we spend a little time comparing answers from assignments. I’m looking for ways to fit that into the course structure. It may be that we use Wednesday review sessions for that purpose.

Quiz topics

  • Lists and list operations (see yesterday’s class)
  • Boolean values and operations
  • Predicate procedures
  • Conditionals

Rotating reminders

  • Visit mentor sessions! We have mentor sessions on Wednesday and Thursday evenings from 8:00-9:00 p.m. in the CS Commons. Wednesdays will be more Q&A, Thursdays will include sample quizzes.
    • This week’s Wednesday mentor session will include a chance to review exam problems!
  • Visit review sessions! I run review sessions on Thursdays at 9am in this room.
    • This week’s Thursday Sam session will also include a chance to review exam problems!

Upcoming Work

Extra credit (Academic/Artistic)

  • Thursday extras, Thursday, 23 Feb 2017, 4:15 p.m., Science 3821: The Future of MathLAN
  • Met Opera Live in HD showing of Rusalka, Saturday, Feb. 25. Talk 11:30-noon, opera noon-3pmish.
  • CS Table, Tuesday at noon: ???
  • Prazak Quartet, Tuesday, 28 February 2017, 7:30 p.m., Herrick.

Extra credit (Peer)

  • Ritalin Test squad, 2-4pm Saturday, Bucksbaum, The Wall
  • Jazz band concert Friday at 7:30 p.m. in Sebring-Lewis.

Extra credit (Misc)

Good things to do

  • Diving championships this weekend
  • NEW Vote: Next week on Thursday (I think) JRC 227 6-8 p.m

Academic honesty, revisited

A bad suggestion: Use thumb screws to convince those who did not sign the second entry to tell you more.

A good suggestion: Provide a leniency clause: Students can tell you that they misunderstood the academic honesty policies and request that you just not count the exam. They will receive a zero, but can replace it with their final exam grade.

A good suggestion: Provide those who felt unable to sign with a way to report more details anonymously.

The result of the second suggestion: “I overheard someone talking on the phone about problems on the exam.” “I saw someone talking to one of the evening tutors about problems on the exam.”