Functional Problem Solving (CSC 151 2013F) : Labs
Primary: [Front Door] [Schedule] - [Academic Honesty] [Disabilities] [Email] [FAQ] [IRC] [Teaching & Learning] [Grading]
Current: [Assignment] [EBoard] [Lab] [Outline] [Partners] [Reading]
Sections: [Assignments] [EBoards] [Examples] [Handouts] [Labs] [Outlines] [Partners] [Readings]
Reference: [Setup] - [Functions A-Z] [Functions By Topic] - [Racket] [Scheme Report (R5RS)] [R6RS] [TSPL4]
Related Courses: [Davis (2013F)] [Rebelsky (2010F)] [Weinman (2012F)]
Misc: [SamR] [Glimmer Labs] [CS@Grinnell] [Grinnell] [Issue Tracker (Course)]
Summary: In this laboratory, you will further explore issues of recursion over trees introduced in the reading on pairs and pair structures and continued in the reading on trees.
a. Make sure that you have the reading on pairs and pair structures and the reading on trees open in separate tabs or windows.
Recall that the pattern for recursion over a tree requires
two recursive calls: one for the car and
one for the cdr.
(definerecursive-proc(lambda (tree) (if (pair? tree) (combine(recursive-proc(car tree)) (recursive-proc(cdr tree))) (base-casetree))))
b. Make sure that you have a piece of paper and writing instrument handy.
Recall the render-color-tree! procedure from the
reading.
;;; Procedure:
;;; render-color-tree!
;;; Parameters:
;;; ctree, a tree of colors
;;; image, an image
;;; left, an integer
;;; top, an integer
;;; width, an integer
;;; height, an integer
;;; Purpose:
;;; Render the tree into the portion of the image bounded at
;;; the left by left, at the top by top, and with the specified
;;; width and height.
;;; Produces:
;;; [Nothing; Called for the side effect.]
;;; Preconditions:
;;; [The usual]
;;; Postconditions:
;;; The tree has now been rendered.
(define render-color-tree!
(lambda (ctree image left top width height)
(cond
((pair? ctree)
(render-color-tree! (car ctree) image
left top
(/ width 2) height)
(render-color-tree! (cdr ctree) image
(+ left (/ width 2)) top
(/ width 2) height))
(else
(image-select-rectangle! image REPLACE
left top width height)
(context-set-fgcolor! ctree)
(image-fill-selection! image)
(context-update-displays!)
(image-select-nothing! image)))))
a. Add render-color-tree! to your definitions pane.
b. Create a new 200x200 image named canvas.
c. What effect do you expect the following instruction to have?
>(render-color-tree! "blue" canvas 0 0 200 200)
d. Check your answer experimentally.
e. What effect do you expect the following instruction to have?
>(render-color-tree! (cons "black" "red") canvas 0 0 200 200)
f. Check your answer experimentally.
g. What effect do you expect the following instruction to have?
>(render-color-tree! (cons (cons "green" "yellow") "orange") canvas 0 0 200 200)
h. Check your answer experimentally.
i. What effect do you expect the following instruction to have?
>(render-color-tree! (cons "red" (cons (cons "blue" "purple") "black")) canvas 0 0 200 200)
j. Check your answer experimentally.
k. Create a color tree that you might be able to render in some interesting fashion.
As you may recall from the reading, we have defined color trees as follows.
t1 and t2 are
color trees, then so is (cons
t1 t2).
Using this recursive definition, write a procedure,
(color-tree? val) that returns true
(#t) if val is a color tree and false
(#f) otherwise.
Rewrite render-color-tree! so that it splits the
image vertically rather than horizontally.
We've now seen two versions of render-color-tree!,
one that divides the section of the image horizontally ane one that
divides the section of the image vertically. Combine these into one
that alternates how it divides the image. That is, it should first
divide the image into left and right halves, render half of the tree
in each half of the image. But when it renders each half, it should
divide the subimage into a top and bottom. And when it renders the top
half, it should divide that subimage into left and right. And so on
and so forth.
For the tree (cons "red" (cons "blue" "white")), we
would expect something like the following.
+--------+--------+ | | | | | blue | + red +--------+ | | | | | white | +--------+--------+
Write a procedure, (count-colors ctree), that counts
how many colors appear in a color tree.
>(count-colors "blue")1>(count-colors (cons "red "blue"))2>(count-colors (cons "red" (cons "white" "blue")))3
Let's explore pair structures more generally. As you've noted, trees are built from cons cells (a.k.a. pairs). Sometimes it is useful to find out how many cons cells are in a tree or other pair structure.
a. Define and test a procedure named
cons-cell-count that takes any Scheme value and
determines how many boxes would appear in its box-and-pointer diagram.
(The data structure that is represented by such a box, or the region
of a computer's memory in which such a structure is stored is called a
cons cell. Every time the cons
procedure is used, explicitly or implicitly, in the construction of
a Scheme value, a new cons cell is allocated, to store information
about the car and the cdr. Thus cons-cell-count also
tallies the number of times cons was invoked during the
construction of its argument.)
For example, the structure in the following box-and-pointer
diagram contains seven cons-cells, so when you apply
cons-cell-count to that structure, it should
return 7. On the other hand, the string "sample" contains
no cons-cells, so the value of (cons-cell-count "sample")
is 0.

In answering this question, you should consider whether each value, in
turn, is a pair using the pair? predicate.
b. Use cons-cell-count to find out how many cons
cells are needed to construct the list
(0 (1 (2 (3 (4)))))
See the notes at the end of the lab if you have trouble creating that list.
c. Draw a box-and-pointer diagram of this list to check the answer.
a. What preconditions should render-color-tree! have?
b. Use the color-tree? predicate from an earlier
exercise to rewrite render-color-tree! so that
it reports an appropriate error if its preconditions are not met.
Use husk-and-kernel style, checking the preconditions in the husk.
c. In your implementation from (b), the tree is traversed twice:
Once in color-tree? to check that the tree is valid, and
once in the kernel to do the work of rendering the tree.
Some programmers see this as inefficient.
Write another version of render-color-tree!
that does not use color-tree? to verify
preconditions. Instead, the kernel should verify as it goes along that
each leaf is a color. That is, the kernel should issue an error message if
it finds any tree value that is neither a pair nor a color.
If you have extra time, you should try some of these explorations or some of the “for those with extra time” problems below.
One potentially interesting way to experiment with color trees is to have a procedure build those trees. How? We might provide the procedure with an intended size of the tree.
a. Using this technique, write a procedure, (, that randomly builds a black and white tree of the appropriate size.
random-bw-tree size)
b. Using this technique, write a procedure, (, that builds a random color tree of the desired size, randomly selecting the color from the list random-color-tree size colors)colors.
Create a new version of render-color-tree! that
has an extra parameter, vsplit?, a Boolean value. If the
Boolean is true, when render-color-tree! should
split the area vertically (as it currently does). If the Boolean is
false, render-color-tree! should split the area
horizontally. In both cases, the recursive calls should negate that
Boolean value so that the splits alternate between vertical and
horizontal.
If you find that you have extra time, you might want to attempt one or more of the following problems.
As you may recall, a tree is either (a) a non-pair value or (b) the cons of two trees. In the reading, you saw a procedure that counted the number of values in a tree. In this lab, you wrote a procedure that counted the number of cons cells (pairs) in a tree. What is the relationship between the numbers returned by those two procedures?
a. Write a procedure, (,
that determines whether color-tree-contains?
ctree color)color appears anywhere in
ctree. (We may have written a similar procedure
during the class discussion. If so, you can start with that procedure.)
b. Rewrite the procedure to determine if a color nearby to color
appears somewhere in ctree. (You might say that two colors
are nearby if their red, green, and blue components all differ by less
than sixteen.)
c. Write (, a generalized version of
tree-contains tree value)color-tree-contains that works with a
heterogeneous tree (that is, a tree that contains multiple kinds of values).
Primary: [Front Door] [Schedule] - [Academic Honesty] [Disabilities] [Email] [FAQ] [IRC] [Teaching & Learning] [Grading]
Current: [Assignment] [EBoard] [Lab] [Outline] [Partners] [Reading]
Sections: [Assignments] [EBoards] [Examples] [Handouts] [Labs] [Outlines] [Partners] [Readings]
Reference: [Setup] - [Functions A-Z] [Functions By Topic] - [Racket] [Scheme Report (R5RS)] [R6RS] [TSPL4]
Related Courses: [Davis (2013F)] [Rebelsky (2010F)] [Weinman (2012F)]
Misc: [SamR] [Glimmer Labs] [CS@Grinnell] [Grinnell] [Issue Tracker (Course)]
Samuel A. Rebelsky, rebelsky@grinnell.edu
Copyright (c) 2007-2013 Janet Davis, Samuel A. Rebelsky, and Jerod Weinman. (Selected materials are copyright by John David Stone or Henry Walker and are used with permission.)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this
license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
or send a letter to Creative Commons, 543 Howard Street, 5th Floor,
San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.