Page Four ) Letters Continued from page 2 a faculty member equal space, and prominence, for a similar piece whooping it up ior Arnold Stein’s lecture on Milton i an intellectual event on campus at least equal in value and im- portance to the showing of “The Battle of Algiers”?_ If you_ would, then be prepared [or i intend to besiege the 5&3 with long exhortatory articles advertising those campus events which strike me as important, And 1 shall expect them to be printed and ieatured in the same conspicuous way in which you featured Mr. Nasser's piece, Were Mr, Nasser’s contribution what it purports to be — a review oi a movie 7 one could perhaps see printing it alter the event and on one oi the inner pages. But Mr, Nasser 7 adopting the philo- sophical position so dear to revolutionaries, that die end justiiies the means — converted his review into a diatribe on the politics and culture of the United States. In the course of his dias tribe, he committed many of the philosophical fallacies which, one is entitled to presume, his train7 ing has enables him to detect and which his position obligates him to eschew, Now Mr. Nasser has confessed to me that he is a “socialist.” After reading his article, I am inclined to reclabel him a “com- munist,” but it really does not matter: one may use the label “fascist” nr “anarchist" or any other “-ist'” it is the suffix “sist” that is important, By making himself an ”-ist” of any kind, Mr. Nasser disqualifies himself for teaching at a liberal arts college. Lest any reader think me doctri- naire,1reier him to Mr. Nasser’s piece in the last 5&8. Such in ability to write clearly (the paper would not be acceptable by the College’s standards as set in the Humanities course) Would cer- tainly make me reluctant to expose my mind to Mr. Nasser’s sophomoric rhetoric and fresh- man logic. For $3200 a year, a Grinnell student is entitled to something more than that. A let- ter is not the place to detail the errors oi Mr. Nasser‘s'harangue: but I give you my word mat I am prepared to do so. Well, an “-ist”, of course. espouses something that- is cate- gorized as an “rism” m in Mr. Nasser’s case, i suppose that he would have to admit to “social- ism." The suffix “-ism“ denotes one oi three things: (1) a practice or action — e.g., plagiarism or Dresses by CORNER ONE Will Corner Ally Guy! Come See . . - BANG'S APPAREL baptism; (2) a state or condition — e,g , barbarism or alcoholism; tat a body of dogma and subs mission thereunto 7 eg, Com- munism, Fascism. American- ism, antirAmericanism, Angllc wsm, etc. Since one can elevate air. word to any one oi three kinds -’ dubious status merely by adding “ism”, the notion of a “body of dogmas' need not imply very much rational thought. The wildest set of irrational impulses can be converted into an ”-ism" by anyone with even a low talent [or etymology. Mr, Nasser’s phrase”Counterrevolutionary lnterventionism" as a label for die foreign policy of postwar America is a fine specimen of the Idiot ease with which ‘-ism‘s' are generated. The phrase achieves the paradoxical ends of being inaccurately censorious and flattering at the same time: To concede any post-war ad ministration of the United States credit for a policy based on dogma is to overestimate grossly the intelligence oi both Republican and Del ocratic leaders. Europeans are always getting into trouble by thinking (a) that political leaders in the United States think the same way they do: (b) that they think at all. “Intellectualism” is not an “-ism” which Ameii- is either adhere to or practice very much The beauty of Mr. Nasser's peculiar brand of “-ism” (shall we call it “Nasserism”7) is that it exemplifir-s all three dis- tinctions oi the suffix “-ism” simultaneously It is a practice, like plagiarism or baptism, and Mr. Nasser, like a baptist, proselytizes with overtly ser» pentine evangelism. It is also a state or condition, like barbarism or alcoholism; and Mr. Nasser, like the alcoholic, finds himself under compulsion to see everything in terms of his -‘-isrn.” And it is a body of dogma and submission (hereunto, like Communism and Fascism; and Mr. Nasser. like both Coma munists and Fascists, sees him- self as riding the crest of “the wave of the future,” triumphant» ly capitalizing (it i dare use that verb of him) on what is really a spuriously selfsied and self consuming sense of historical inevitabllty 7 as ii men could derive any sense ot virtue irom being dominated and enslaved by historical forces. SCARLET AND BLACK Well, probably no great harm has been done, for we may rely on the native and dense integrity of the human mind to survive even the most radical impact and impulse; and there may even be some good to be derived from Mr. Nasser. Field trips are now a regular part of education, and hence we take the student to see a slum, a dope addict, and insane asylum. Mr. Nasser’s presence relieves us Irom the need for making certain kinds of field trips; he is to us what C. S, Lewis was to readers a Paradise Lost — a living exponent oi a body of dogma so alien that we ought to feel grateful for having a ”real live" example at our elbow. As we ponder the ”ism” which Mr. Nasser claims to represent and espouse, we ought to keep him firmly in mind. Nothing is more salutary to a teacher man a good example, even if one “good” example he oisomething bad. John Crossett Classical Languages To The Editors: With regard to Mr. Nasser's “The Battle of Algiers" Anatomy of a Revolution, I find myself in accord with his enthusi- asm for the film, but distressed by his complete acceptance of Time's paranoid assessment of the film as a “blueprint for revolutionists.” “The Battle of Algiers” is most emphatically not a blueprint for revolutionists and most particularly not a blue print for urban revolutions If there is a lesson to be learned from the film it is that revolution bascd on even a well organized terrorist activity operating out of an urban ghetto can and will be Suppressed by established authority. what prevents “The Battle of Algiers” from becoming simply a tragic miscalculation of urban guerlllas is that while the terror LE'ITERS— Continued on page a 5&8 SPORTS NEEDS_REFORTERS to cover Men‘s I.M.s Ice Hockey Wrestling and who! have you. it you are interested con» tact the 5&3 or notify the 5,: arts Editor [student Box 7%). If You Think That Ahrvano’s Make Piua, YOU'RE RIGHT! But do you know that Ahrvano's also makes and do, livers hamburgers and sandwiches. including the brand new PIZZA SANDWICH 7 AND MORE! Ahrvano's has Chicken in a Basket and another new specialty — FISH IN A BASKET, with 3 pieces of fish, Continental Fries and Texas Toast. Call or Visit AHRVANO'S PIZZA 915 State Street 236-6222 ) Liberal Ed. Continued from page 3 proceed inahitrand-miss fashion, and a good education is an art. like the art of carpentry and architecture and engineering, then it must, like any other art, have definite principles; and if so, then it must have a unique goal and therefore a unique defir nition. 3, By definition, students are learners, not teachers, and to allow them to decide on what their general education should be is to assume that they already know what it is; it is like allowing a sick man to decide on what medicine to take or whether he should be operated on or not. Such education does not prevent them from choosing specific goals; in iact, it often helps them to better survey the various alternatives, 4. In general, professors are competent in special fields, but, having received a liberal educa- tion. which is general in nature, they have as a group some know- ledge oi the advantages of such education 7 certainly more than students do. Differences among them as to what that education should be exist, but they agree on most issues. The lack oi a single definition does not deny its possible existence; it merely suggests that we should make a greater eiiort to come close to it. 5. Specialization does not ex» clude the integration oi various fields In fact, it makes the en- couragement cl integration more urgent. Lack of communication results from lack of integration Integration IS possible with a DRAPES—SL Friday. February 20, liberal education which is common to all Therefore a liberal education should have a single deiinltton. 6. The tendency in the last few decades on the part of colleges to pay less attention to the development oi character m students is partly responsible ior the increase in lack of com» munication between students and administration and in campus disorders, Freedom for one who knows what the good 15 and follows it is good; but, for one who is irresponsible and follows his emotion, it is evil. There exist such things as proper habits for all, e.g., responsibility, generr osity. and respect for others, and these should be part of a liberal education for all students, 7. Man’s nature does not change; he is still rational (capable of making general statements, communicating, reasoning, etc.) So as long as he remains a man, his generic potentialities remain the same. if he adds to his knowledge, such change is one of degree, Now a liberal education is Concerned with what is best for him generically. as a man; so such education should have a single definition. The arguments here given {or and against a single definition of a liberal education are dialectical in character, Our next concern is to indicate some preliminary principles of education and then proceed to a definition. ______—. Students interested in the Washington Semester ior next {all should Contact Mr. A Jones Within the next two weeks. All applications must be in beiore spring vacation. IPCOVERS I970 PROFESSIONALLY l7, DRYCLEANED 8: FINISHED .will look better longer With / ollr professional care and the special STA'NU finishing proc- ess which restores "like Now" j‘ W look it tool to all fabrics at no, / extra cost to you. Meeker's service available at both North and South Cleaning Agencies. Meeker Laundry 8r Cleaners 1019‘/2 Broad St. Grinnell, Iowa