Page Two The Scarlet & Black sendenl Newspaper oi Grinnell College, Grinnell, Iowa “gaming An independ. cm newspaper Dub- lsned weekly, ex- eDt during hollc ays and cxanlinw \ ion periods, by the «Mummies crinncll commmcc . on Student Publica~ tlons. Subscriphon mic saw per school year. $83 EDITOR/Al Late last semester a group of students, includ— ing the Senate, composed a paper entitled The De» cision-Making Progress at Grinnell College: The Student Position and Proposals for Structural Change. In it they offered a program for student power in academic, social, and administrative mat- ters, The arguments for this assumption of power, such as they are, rest on two principles. First, since the education of the students themselves is the rai- son d’etre of the college. they ought to have a voice in the formulation of the policies which directly af- fect their education. Second, the principle of demo- Edlmis , Harry Fulmn, Lloyd Carson business Manager John Brody Mannidng Edllor ,... Layout Edlmr . Sieve Grow . nan: Sehnurmnn Sports Editor ,. , John Pepper Reponers Cxlhy Ncwlrlrk, Mork Subleman. Gm: Butcher, Regal: Graham, xumryn nelnxe. amour” cracy ought to be operative in any liberal arts col-' lege, both because it is inherently just and because student participation in government is a valuable educational device by which the college can produce responsible and intelligent graduates These are beguiling arguments, as evidenced by their growing acceptance on many campuses, One can perceive in the student manifesto the rhetoric of self righteous indignation and a certain smugness that comes from the belief that here at last is a call to radical action which is not simply an invitation to destruction. Un- fortunately, these arguments, written in execrable prose, rise above the insipid only to reach the level of fatuity. We agree wholeheartedly that the education of the students at Grinnell College should be the pri- mary concern of the administration, faculty, and mirabile dictu, the students themselves, From this principle, however, it does not follow that equal stu- dent participation in the formulation of college poli- cies is the best means to this end. Particularly in academic policy, it is madness to give a equal vote to the students who have implicitly ad- mitted by their presence in the college that they do not know the matters which they propose to govern. There is perhaps some validity in the analogy of a doctor and a patient. Clearly, the end of the re lationship between the doctor and the patient is the health of the patient, But is it not absurd to believe that the doctor and the patient ought to have an equal vote in choosing the appropriate medicine or treatment? To believe this is tantamount to believ- ing that goodness or truth may be determined by a majority vote. Of course, the doctor may make a mistake and it is even possible that in a given in- stance the patient may happen to be right and the doctor wrong concerning the best remedy. But if the patient distrusts the motives or the skill of the doctor he is free to consult another man. In most cases, however, it is the doctor who is in the best position to determine what is conducive to the health of the patient. Similarly, we believe that the faculty and administration, though they have, at times, shown an embarrassing lack of good sense, are in the best position to formulate academic and administrative policies. And in a small college such as Grinnell where almost everyone is forced to live on campus, there is some question as to how much we can separate social policy from academic policy without making the latter ineffective. We deny that democracy should be the political principle operat- ing on campus. In fact, in the present situation, we are best governed by a genuine aristocracy, albeit an imperfect one. Practically speaking, we must SCARLET AN D BLACK .Jr/V‘ 37“». You EXPECT To LIVE. M— PETE, AND ULT/MATELY ACHIEVE CHECKMATE m is; THIS CHESSBOARD , "" WORLD OFOURS WITHOUT 7H5 RULES OF THE GAME? Friday. January 23. |970 Letters to the Editor. . . To The Editors: We the undersigned believe that the policy of Grinnell College Forum grill has been unduly harsh in its stance on choosing new soft drink flavors. We got Dr. Pepper without being con- sulted by either the Dean’s office or by the grounds and buildings supervisor. We demand that 1) Mountain Dew be Sold in the Forum and that 2) All furuler decisions regarding soft drink flavors be turned over to a student- iaculty committee. FOMDC (Friends of Mountain Dew Committee) Lester Elliott Edmond, Jr. Mark David Kasz Ron Stanford Galen Gilbert Ann H. Wollgamot Fat Jack Rued Bill Wright Eric Tanner Terry Finn Kandy Sebring Jeff Millikin Ed Hirsch Mick Schaalman Bobbie Jones Animal Meyer Timothy Power Bruce Howie Fay Hazelkorn To the Ediloflslz Try though I may, i cannot resist answering Krystina Neu- man’s letter in the last issue of the 8&3. Although the cone siderable hysteria in it doesn’t warrant a reply by anyone, the serious question which she raises does. Further, it deserves a reply from someone whom she’d regard as being in lhe local Publications Establishment. And as chairman oi last year’s Com mittee on Student Publications and Radio, I no doubt qualify. First, let me fulfill her (and many others’) expectations by pointing out that she has not done the homework required of a good journalist: she has not bothered to read the document which replaces the old Board of Publi- cations with the Committee “Statement of Revised Duties for Committee on Student Publi- cations and Radio,“ see Faculty Handbook, pp. 79-32.) If she had, she would have learned that the Committee is not “dominated by the faculty-administration block.” Rather, its voting membership comprised: “three faculty members nominated by the Committee on Faculty organ- ization and elected by the Facility and three students appointed by the President of the S.G.A. and have some measure of trust in the faculty and ad- ministration, although we admit that this is a pros- pect exceedingly distasteful to many. This is not to say, of course, that students ought not to be consult— ed in all these matters or that, on occasion, some ex- cellent innovative ideas have been proposed by stu- dents. But in the long run we believe that student power would tend to be more corruptive than edu- cational, We students are sufficiently aware of the falli- bility of the faculty and administration. We ought to be equally aware of our own fallibility and relae tive ignorance lest we are compelled to endure the tyranny of our majority. approved by the Student Senate” (17.50.) Also, she would have found no documentary evidence whatso- ever supporting her implication that the Committee is protecting “the college’s status quo image.” instead that body is solely con- cerned “to protect its (the College’s) legal interests;" less euphemistically, to protect its en» dowment from legal suits arising from libelous material in student (publications. That this is the sole. operational concern is evidenced by the fact that the document permits the College to withhold puhlicationof such material “only when it has been advised by legal counsel that its legal interests are in jeopardy.” (See “Statement of Policy and Procedures: Student Publications,” which cum- plements and implements the above mentioned Statement and which is 3 available from the Committee or the Professional Adviser.) Could the College do otherwise? Could it knowingly allow unlawful material to be published? The student editor is allowed nearly as much freedom as is compatible with abiding by the laws of libel. 1 say “nearly" because the document does also include a vague clause stating that the editor shall avoid “in- decency, undocumented allega- tions, attacks on personal integr rity, and the techniques of harassment and innuendo.” (Incidentally, this clause ex- presses the usual canons of responsible journalism and is quoted verbatim from the “Joint Statement of Rights and Freedoms of Students," endorsed by the AA.P and the N,s,A,; Cour. p. s __—— "When you’ve got problems With swine, you’ve got to call in the pigs.” — 775.1.Hayakawa