Iaiur'day, September 27. W69 SCARLET AND BLACK iETTERS IO THE EDITOR Doubts " super Channels" To the Ediml’: When mil-litmus facully coin- mittees were opened to Students last year, I applauded the action as a positive sicp toward grant~ iug sludc r a meaningful voice in the (1 ns which affect them. Howey a year's experi- ence as a v the Science D tloilal Policy Committee (EPC) his led me In) believe that slu- dcilt illL‘lu"l0'l on selected {ocul- ty commi lens may ho a my hollow chrLUl". My sen . oi discouragement does not stem from the work of the EPC icself, In fact, this committee who a perfect model 0f just how Constructive and fruitful studentriaculty com- mittees can be. We carefully consider numerous education is- sues, and our voting by no means pitted faculty against Stu.- dents. The committee members, eager to pursue a substantial ogcndu we set for ourselves, cir- culated poshon papers, motions, and amendments. We nlet prac- tically every week, and we kept in'contact with the faculty and student constituents whom we represented. Much of the EPC’s time was dcvoied to considering compre- hensive examinations, The elk max of our work was a vote on this iollowmg student-initiated motion: “The EPC proposes that com- prehensive examinations for sen— iors should be eliminated as a general college requirement. Since the Spemfie ideals of calm pi'chensive learning will vary with the department, the deci- sion as to the existence and nature of an examination (scmi- liar or project) to accomplish these ideals. should be_left to the dcpur'cillcnt and should be decided with student participa- tion and some thought to the students' lnrlh’ldual needs." The committee unanimously approved iln, motion (alrhouuh two faculty members were ab- sclit). [is simple and uniiiifl§l< noiirc as inDtioll may ap- pear. ii. nc1.