Page Fa... An independent newspaper publlsllrd weekly. except during holidays And exami- nation ocrtoos. by the Gnnncll Commiuee oh Srudnnx Publlcntions. Subscription rotc 56,00 per school year. . James Alexander Arfeu Katllcrfnc Ncwknk Slevllcn crow Yvor Sfobklev , Bruce strcm , Douglas earl , , . Mimi AndErson susau Kacser, Mark saolcman Nancy becketr, comue Encson, John Gardner, .vonh Gordlcy, Reggie Graham, Allan Hart, Jonathan Jenklns, Peul Lewis, Bonnie Nelson, clndy Root, Mark sablerhau. Kristi Schmlu, Lynne Selmers, mar. Tepler Assistants ,. ,. .. ,, ., Sheena Brown, Pearl Ksoota CPS] tnlltsmlc rm. samra Editorelnrcmcr Managing Edlto Associate co r Sports Edimr Busmcss Manager Circulation Manager Cartoonlst Photographers . Reporters Nixon’s Victory This week the country made its choice and elected Richard Nixon president of the United States. The country chose the worse of two evils and will suffer for it. The people chose to be insensible to the prob- lems of the ghetto, the problems of unemployment, and the other social problems of America. They chose to prolong international tensions and the armaments race, Mr. Nixon has said that “We have been poure ing billions into those Federal antipoverty programs and we have reaped a harvest of riot, frustration and failure.” On account of the Vietnam war, how. ever, the first items in the budget to be out have been the antipoverty programs. Besides, the Con- gress has never appropriated the amount of money the bills’ sponsors have stated was necessary for the accomplishment of the programs. Nixon has in- dicated that he intends to reduce the national bud- get by scrapping most of the antipoverty programs. His answer to the economic problems of Black peo- ple is to provide tax incentives for “black capital- ism," a solution hardly adequate to the magnitude of the problem. Nixon has suggested as a solution to the prob- lem of inflation an increased unemployment What kind of man would suggest a method for solving one problem that involved the creation of another which would mean vast misery to innumerable peo- 1e.7 p On the major issues of our time Mr. Nixon kept silent throughout his campaign, Nixon spent only four years in the House of Representatives and two years in the Senate, For the last sixteen years he as had no position of public responsibility. As vice president to Eisenhower and as a private citizen Nixon showed himself as neither an innovator of legislation nor as a statesman. As a member of Con- gress he spent most of his time warning America about the evils of communism. Our best hint of what the new Nixon admin- istration will be like came when Nixon chose Spiro Agnew, a man inexperienced in national poli- tics, as his vice presidential running mate. Ag- new is also a man of questionable morality consid- ering his purchases of lands intended for public pro- jects and his other conflicts of interest. We can also wonder if the affection shown at the Republican Convention between Strom Thurmond and Nixon will continue when Nixon resides in the White House. In this cold war, now two decades old, there have been few calming enterprises One of the maj- or steps in relieving the enmity between the Soviet Union and the United States was the sale of Ameri- can wheat in 1963. Mr. Nixon called the sale “a foreign policy blunder even more serious than the fouling of the Bay of Figs. Mr. Nixon, unlike the unsuccessful Democratic nominee, has never indicated much interest in slow- ing the arms race. During his campaign he claimed that the United States was suffering a “security gap” and losing its nuclear lead over Russia. He has indicated that, if elected president, he will in- crease the country’s nuclear arsenal, already large enough to kill every Russian several times. The United States faces hard times. But we en- dured Eisenhower, and we even endured Johnson, for the gods put an enduring heart in men. Perhaps we shall survive Nixon. SCARLET AND BLACK Friday, November 8.196. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR Steve Kent Compares Crosseh‘, Schneirov I dislike the position of having to correct another of Mr. Cross- ett's chronic and jaded mis- readings of history, but I would like to set the record straight on one matter. Never in my time at Grinnell, did I instigate, draft or circulate any petitions whatsoever (ex- cept on behalf of certain candl- dates for office). With regard to the numerous petitions circulated by a variety of well-wishers and participants on the day of the lllriamed sleep- in two years ago, I did not par- ticipate in the drafting or cirr culatlon of any of these peti- [Ions which, I understand, gar- nered over 800 signatures in the space of apprDleately twelve hours. Nor were these petitions ever used by me, or even all collected from their circulators, precisely because some of them were sloppily drawn and be- cause the fast-pace of events made it questionable in our minds that all of the signers were fully aware of the implica- tions of signing. Your relation of the facts sug~ gests that you may have those petitions confused with one widely circulated among my class by some of my classmates a few days before our gradua- tion. This petition, which called for a realistic review of the opens policy, something i still believe IS needed at Grinnell, was published in the 5&3 in a substantially altered form, to the chagrin of a number of its signers, including myself. who were not given notice of the changes. 1 had nothing to do with the drafting or circulation of thls petition in either its orl~ ginal or adulterated form and was one of those who requested that their names be removed from the list of signers. “Demagoguery”. “dishonest". "mampulation" are 5 tr 0 n 3 words, particularly when associ- ated with an incorrect relation of the facts. Doesn't this kind of public character assassination, Mr. Crossett, done behind the victim’s back and without the decency of reasonable notice. strike you as being just a bit uhtalr and reprehensible — per- haps, as you might have it, even Schneirovian? I have done some things that I would be hard-pressed to de- fend in retrospect, but gross deception is not one of them. And. really, Mr. Crossett, to style me as a demagogue is not a little like accusing Phyllis Diller of being a sex-pot. It's a flattering charge but one that just can't be sustalned under scrutiny. My own preference always has been for the politics of cans ciliation and of compromise and, l think, with the exception of a radicalized moment or two, I have been a fairly consistent practitioner of that brand. I like to think that had some of us been better heeded two years ago. some of the dlvls lions that now plague the cam- pus might have been avoided. Yet 1 rather doubt that anything I could have done (or not done) in the short time available to and would have greatly changed the course of recent Grlnnell his- tory. I may be a good case study for the proposition that "the evil men do live after them while the good is oft ins terred with their bones. . ." but I hardly qualify as the commits ter of the Original Sin. I suspect that the. drug-cult, the black power movement. the politics of confrontation and S. D. S., distasteful as they are to me as well as to you. Mr. Crossett. were. if f date use the term, hlstorlcal lnevitahillties tor Grinnell as they probably were for the nation. I suspect also that these phenomena will largely modify or pass away within a relatively Short time. Their premises are too irration- al and inadequate to long satis— fy the discerning mind of the Grinnell student. I doubt the gross clamorings of the S. D. S. are very repreA senlatlve of the true proclivi- ties of more than 8 handful even Within the S. D. 5., al» though I'm sure that you could get a majority to claim that they were it you picked the right moment to ask. Nor do I consider the evident weakness of the present S.G.A. to be representative of the true potential of student government at Grinnell. And I intend that analysxs as no dlsparagemem or our successors ln S.G.A. It is only natural that student gov- ernment should be in a de pressed state. Virtually the en- tire political and social fabric of the student society has been rent and lain to waste by the abrupt and drastic “reforms" of the past year and a half, leaving only a void to operate in where custom, precedent and tradition once served as guides. When I recall the care given in attempting to put a compar- atively modest reform, the also lltlon of women’s hours, on a posltlve footing, l shudder at the innocence with which Gl'innell- ians have played with institua {ions in recent months, p e r h a p s all administrators as well as students have been guilty at one time or another of taklng too many cues from the Revulutlon and not enough from Burke. Still, I remam in the be- lief that the great majority of Grinnell’s Students are intelli- gent enough and wise enough to know, or to soon rediscover, that the key to power and influ- ence lies not in passion but in reason. not with the politics of confrontation but with the pull- u'cs of compromise. I still have confidence in the ability of Grinnell students, given a strong and healthy insti~ tutional undergirding, to largely govern themselves responsibly and tolerably well and to parti- cipate constructively in the plan- ning and operation of the Col- lege. No, Mr. Crossett, we wlll al~ ways be at odds. For it seems to me that in your own way you are as blind to the possibilities of good In the students as Mr. Schncimv is to posslbililies for good in the administratlon. Neither perspectlve, in my oplm ion, is a particularly healthy or productlve one to maintaln. You and Mr. Schneirov, thounh udniluodly bole: man. are In fact two or a klno, Mr, Crossett: dogmatic and blind in your opinions, incapable of reasonable compromise, so sure of your hold on The Truth. The College community would do well to avoid taking either of you too seriously. Steve Kent, ’61 Brotherhood Review Called Ludicrous To the Hilton Mr. Stump's and the souls Criticism of the Brotherhood, lure the reason given for print- ing the Wallace ad, reflects a high degree of American intel- lectual excretion, Do not pester me wlth Amerlcan rhetoric, ethics or morals for they have been tried and proved wanting. The son need not speak to the Brotherhood as to what a paper should or should not print. What kind of game do you think the white races have been playing with the colored people of this world — Hopscotchl Your article clearly demon- strates that you know nothing of American political realism. .You have unwisely rushed into a Black area of human eXpea rience of which you know little. If you being white can. not even understand the human motivations of your own race. then how in hell are you going to be able to say anything in- telligent about the human moti. vatiuns of Blacks? In short, when it comes to defining real- ism for Blacks, the 5&3 staff should keep its juvenile mouth shut, for lts naivete has already led to moronic utterances of the most ludicrous nature. I! realism makes you nauseous, then crawl to the nearest hole in the ground and discharge yourself there but do not be- come emetic at my feet. The fetus deep within the womb of Mother America Cries out in wretched anguish, for even before birth it has come to realize that the American by stem engenders incurable sick blood cells which will eventually destroy even tho healthiest of brain Cells. Ac- cept your mother’s blood and go insane. T. L. Gillespie Rothsfein Rut Rakes Review To the Editor: I hope I will he pardoned for being in a rut, but it seems that being in a rut ls very fashion- able among certain members of the 58:3 staff with whom I wish to take issue. In particular, I have in mind that distinguished columnist, ooh Stump. His latest calumny, “Where the Truth Lies . . .," in a perfect example of what I mean. To begin with, Mr. Stump shows his unfailing ahll- ity to misinterpret that which he does not wish to agree with. He states, with reference to The Brotherhood, that “Most of the paper was addressed to fellow Black students with the purpose of gaining unity and political power." This ll true“ LETTERS— (Cont’d. on Page I. col .1)