Friday, April I2, W68 SCARLET AND BLACK THE GARRISON CAMPUS By PHIL SEMAS Collegiate Press Service WASHINGTON — American Students have long been second only to American Negroes as an oppressed class in this country. Many writers have recently iocused on that oppression—Nat lien- toii with “Youth: the Oppressed Majority" bt Playboy and the Loo Angeles Free Press with its widely quoted “Students are Niggers" article. For years students were denied basic rights available to most other citizens, as were Negroes. Lately, colleges have been grant- ing students more or their rights, such as authority over rules oi conduct and sometimes even a voice in making educational policies — just as a rapid succession oi civil rights laws have given Ne- groes many paper rights. But Negroes have always been faced wilh a diiiei'ent kind of oppression: police with cattle prods, tear gas, dogs, and guns. American students have seldom had to face that — until this year. Now, at the same time as US. cities are arming to maintain “law and order" this summer, many campuses are moving closer to becoming armed garrisuns. understandably, black students tare the greatest danger, since they are simultaneously members oi two oppressed groups. Thus we have several hundred police attacking the campus oI Texas Southern University. And we have police shooting down unarmed students at South Carolina State in Orangeburg. Many black leaders have said that such violence will he con- fined to black schools, that black students will continue to he shot down but white students won’tt They may be right. But there are some dangerous signs on white campuses; they have already seen police violence and they could see some killing. Last fall, in the face at dozens of disruptive dellionstrntiorls against campus recruiting by the military and Dow Chemical Company, administrations at the University or Wisconsin, Brook- lyn College, and several other colleges called in outside police to “deal" with the demonstrators. Students were teargassed, beaten, and bullied. Now more campuses are arming. Campus police at the Uni- versity of Utah and Colorado State are now armed with Chemical mace. It has actually been used on students at Colorado Stale. At some schools the campus police now carry guns. some administrations. oi course, don‘t want their campuses turned into armed camps. But they otten ilnd the garrison philos- ophy being imposed irom the outside. Thus, San Francisco State College President John Summer- skill was attacked by Governor Ronald Reagan, legislators and college trustees ior not calling in the police during a disruptive campus demonstration. , And California is now considering creation of n state-wide cam- pus police, under the command or Governor Reagan, not campus administrators. And there is LBJ’s GIBaL Drug War. Supposedly part ot a new effort against “crime,” his proposed legislation is aimed not at organized underworld drug protiteers but at the people who use drugs, mainly students. Under the new law a student who loans a pep pill to a triend during finals is a tederal criminal. The new legislation would make pot busts like the mass police raid at Stony Brook, NY. an almost common occurrence. And it will also prob- ably mean even more campus iniiltration by narcotics agean. Just as many blacks have called Johnson‘s “crime message” this year’s civil rights hill, so might students call it this year’s education message The causes of this situation should be obvious. Students have turned to disruptive protests because they are ted up with their schools’ complicity with what President Eisenhower called the military-industrial complex. That complex promulgates war and killing ior proilt and students rightly argue that universities ought to have nothing to do with it. Instead at providing the complex with services such as research and a place to recruit manpower, universities ought to be fighting it, students have argued. But not many university administrations _ and certainly not the military-industrial complex itself — can afford that kind of dissent. At tirst they answered with empty words about ireedom, the ireadom that the military-industrial complex is destroying in America and around the world. Now they are beginning to answer with iorce just as they have answered the Negro’s demand tor more than paper rights with force. Oppression of students is not yet at severe as that attire American Negro. Not yet. lilllllllllllilllllilllllillllllilllllllllllillllllllllllilllllillllllllllllilllliilllll NEW HAVEN, Conn. April 1 (SCN) — About one quarter of the undergraduate student body and 150 male graduate students at Yale were polled last month concerning their reaction to cancellation of graduate defer— MMVS VVMWWW “This is the truth . . . Nail ’em up . . . Nail ‘em up it they don’t deliver. Nail up anybody who stands in your way. You hand me the hammer and I’ll do it with my own hand. Nail ’em up on the barn door. merits. Twenty per cent said they would emigrate rather than serve; another eighteen per cent plan to reluse serv- ice. remain in this country, and lace the legal consequences. You ask my what my pro- gram is. Here it is, you hicks. And don’t you torget it. Nail ‘em up it they don’t deliver." —l-luey P. Long anchorwoman (it? POT (Continued trom Page 1) were made alter two mouths of undercover lliVeStlga‘ lion with the full co-opemtion or university oitictals. Because many students had already lett tor vacation and more are expected to leave he- iore the hour or the raid, no action by students is expected in response to the raitl. The Eagle, in cm editorial, is not opposing the raid, since “the students broke the law," This is the second such pre~ dawn raid this year. An earlier raitl at the State University or New York at Stony Brook l'e- suited in 34 arrests Dn inarir jnana charges. WVWMMVVMM “I was suffused with the ideals oi ireednm ct expression and the open market place. i had the most emphatic belief that this freedom should be used to posi- tive purposes, that ireedom is as Ireedom does. . . I did not know as much about bait-cut- ting then as i would later. But i wanted the paper which would brietly be mine to be a living thing, instinctive and meaningiul, in both its own tradition of hard - hitting, out- spoken American j'oumalism. . . “i have oiten asked myself In the years that iollowed, would I do all this again? I would be less than honest it I answered that question simply.” —Willie Morris mammogram Resist On April 3rd Grinnell Col- lege held an author-alt cere- mony in conjunction with a nation-wide chart to resist the draft. Held ill ARH auditorium. the event was attended by an es- timated 200 members, Ill! 0i whom signed the Rams com- plicity statement to ”support these Americans (who return their dralt Cards) with en- couragement, counsel, and atria." As the third such move- ment, this event was preiaced by similar Resists here and elsewhere in the nation on Our)- her 16th and December 4th of last year. Over 1500 men sev- ered their ties with the Selec< tlve Service System then. Most of these men handed in their dl'ait cards. Others handed in statements at nunrcooperation—havlng al- ready burned their drait cards prior to the 4th or the 16th—- or made public their refusal to register. lIlllIIilllliilllillllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIIllllilillllllllllilillllllllllllllllll PORTLAND, Ole, March 29 (SCN) — cver sixtyiive per cent oi the male seniors at Reed College hele have signed a statement declaring they will not serve in the armed iorcas of the United States, The Reed nralt Union is reportedly setting up a legal fund to hire lawyers for and pay court costs for students who are eventual— .1), brought to trial for reiusiug induction. 0" THE RIGHT By Wm. F. BUCKLEY, Jr. 1 note with sorrow that Mr: Howard K. Smith has qult tho column-willing business because oi his general disgust with com temporary toul'nulism. Particularly, he cites the buildup that has been given to Stokely Carmichael, insisting that by giving lnm such attention as we have, we are all oi us Frankensteius, busily creating our own little monsters. Now Mr. Smith himscli has been given to a strange produc- tion or two, as when he invited Alger Htss ot all people to join a television panel to discuss the tall oi Richard Nixon after his detect in 1962. Mr. Hlss is about as qualitied to discuss the short- comings oi lvir. Nixon as Mr. Oswald would have been to discuss those at Mr, kennedy. Still, he has a point worth contemplating. He gave another example, namely the notorious photograph oi a month ago de~ picling the police Clitel's execution oi a Vet Cong. “Not even a perinnctory acknowledgment was made at the tact that such executtons. en masse, are the Vet Cong \Vay ot war.” He quoted his own sun in Vietnam, leit for dead by the Com- munists, who witnessed the execution by the enemy oi a dozen U.S. soldiers in unilorm. Note that the Viet Cong was nut in nnitorm, and hence was subject to execution. To be sure, aiter a trial. The interesting question is, how do you hold trials in a city that is burning up with insurgency? The answer is that, as a matter at fact, you don't usually have trials in such circumstances. Thai. is one ot the reasons why wars are so hateiul. It is interesting that the critics of the Vietnam war tend to criticize it because war is dreadful, but [hell they tend to criticize that which goes to make war dreadlul. it it were possible to wage wars without killing people, or destroyingeiarms, houses, water- works, and schools, then wai‘ wouldn't be dreadful. is it loo much to ask that they at least accept the ontological structure of war, and then criticize it? l do not know whether, at the time Mr. Smith resigned, ho had seen the NbC telecast, on the war, whose transcript 1 now have, with master ot ceremonies Edwin Newman, and expert guests. 1 should think it would have accelerated his decision. (Professor Seymour Mclman weighed in with his criticism or the alorementioned execution.) The most striking aspect of it was the brief historical rum down by Mr. Newman which went, so help me, “National elections to reunlly Vietnam were to be held in 1955. Agreements were not signed by South Vietnam or the United States, which (ltd not want to approve a settlement that legiti- mized Communist rule in another country, or even half a country. The United States did promise uni. m use iorce to overturn the Geneva Agreement. After the division of Vietnam, Bat) Dal was soon nudged aside by the man who was to dominate South Viet- 11am for almost a decade, Ngo Dinli Diem." “Willi American sponsorship, advice, and economic help, he consolidated his power around his family and his Catholic co. religlomsts, many oi them irom the North. There seems little doubt that Ho Chi Minh would have won the nationwide election! scheduled for l95li, but Diem refused to hold the election. The United States supported hurt and said the elecitons could not possibly have been tan- in the North. Diem also continued to crush all opposition.” It is easier to rebuild Hue than that travesty. No mention oi the grisly purges conducted by no that caused a million North Vietnamese to flee south; no mention that Ho's popularity in 1954 was like Castro's on New Year's Day 1959. Both were popular, None, ninety clays aiter achieving power, would have risked a tl‘uly free election. No mention that Diem conducted two elections and won both oi them. None that his government requested U.S. aid. No mention that South Vlelnilm had been set up as n separate state in 1946, and that the majority oi the United Nations were disposed to grant it membership in 1952 and again in 1957 and would have except for a Soviet veto. To observe that Diem “crushed” the opposirion without men. tioning that the North took care at its opposition by killing them, or chasing them south; is — well, akin to staring at the picture of the viet Cong in Saigon and cluckrcltlcklng about the cruelitlea oi the South Vietnamese. Mr. Smith is on to something. We seem to Want. to believe that we are very evil people, supporttng other people who are very evrl. some people get a kick out oi that, excluding. ! am glad to note, Mr. Howard K, Smith.