Friday, May 9. m4 SCARLET AND BLACK Page Seven Anku Investigates Ghana's Non-Alignment Foreign Policy By Vince Anku Some Americans believe that small nations must either be for them or against them. This is not true. Ghanaians contend that neither power block is per- manently right and so they cannot irrevocably belong to either camp. Ghanaians wish to live peaceably with all coun— tries irrespective of their polit- ical ideology. To this and Ghana a nonvalignment policy. Ghana adopts a non-alignment policy. Ghana has not invented non- alignment policy. "Thomas Jef- ferson, a great American, advocated non-alignment pol- icy of America some 174] years ago. He said inconnection with American foreign policy, ‘Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, en- tangling alliances with none.’ ” (Nkrumah's radio address. Dec, 22, 1961) Defendng Nkrumah’s “Afri- can Socialism” against un- founded charges of Commu- nism, St. Clair Drake of Chica— go made some pertinent re- marks. Drake was a professor of sociology in Ghana for some two and one-half years. He is now the director of the African Studies Program at Roosevelt University. He argued that Ghanas foreign policy, not her socialistic orientation, is a more valid criterion for accu- sation. “. . . At the U. N. Ghana has always voted against the Rus- sian idea of a trolka to replace the Secretary General, but it also votes for admission of Red China. It has repeatedly re< buked both sides for dragging heels on the banning of nuclear tests. During the Cuban crisis, Ghana delegates expressed sympathetic understanding in the United States’ fears, but op- posed an invasion of Cuba. It did not go along with Cuba‘s attempt to have a renewed Se- curity Council debate on the is- sue. There is absolutely no substance at all to Senator Dodd's charge that Nkrumah has “consistently supported the Soviet Union and Cuba in the U. N.” ‘ . Americans who object to the policy of ‘positive nonalign— ment,’ African socialism, the one party state, and militant Pan-Africanism, have a tend- ency to label all of these orien- tations ‘Communism’ as do Ghanaians who prefer other political styles. This simply confuses the issue. The crucial question from the American foreign policy standpoint is not whether the Ghanian government is author- itarian the United States sup- ports the governments of Li- beria and various other African authoritarian states — nor whether it is socialistic — the United States helped to finance Clement Attlee’s Labour gov- ernment and Tito’s Commun- ism—Pan-Africanism is not a Communistic movement and is no menace to the United States. The relevant questions are: ‘Does Ghana have an independ- ent foreign policy not tied to that of the U. S. S. R. or Chi- na?’ and 'ls it likely to keep that orientation?‘ A careful study of Ghana and its leader might produce a positive an- swer to both questions. . . ." (New York Times, July 30, 1963, 23:4) A short while ago, speaking on the tenth anniversary of "Positive Action," a non-Vio- lent-movement for independ- ence, President Nkrumah made a similar remark: “I must emphasize that our party’s foreign policy contin- ues to be based upon positive neutralism and non—alignment. We are convinced that by our policy of non-alignment we are able to speak our minds, frank- ly and without fear and favour on issues as they arise. Our positive stands are based on our own convictions, complete- 1y uninfluenced by any of the power blocs. We believe that we could help bridge the unfor» tunate and undesirable gap be- tween the so-called East and West bloc by not aligning our- selves with either side. . . . We hold the view that as to the issues between them, neither bloc can claim to be perma— nently ,right or permanently wrong. We should be free to take our stand without previ- ously committing ourselves to any bloc on any matters which affect the peace, progress, and indeed, the destiny of Af- rica. We believe that it would be suicidal to involve our selves in the disputes of the great powers by taking sides. We will continue to cultivate and maintain friendly relations with all counuies.” Ghana is thus able to put for- ward unbiased proposals for the settlement of specific is- sues. Ghana's policy on three specific issues—China’s admis- sion to the U. N., the nuclear disarmament, and the Middle East problem—which current- ly affect World Peace can serve as examples of Ghanian thinking. As regards the Middle East, Ghana is concerned with the long range problem of the de- pressed masses of me Arab countries, and the short range problem of the Arab-Israel ten- sion. At the 1960 General As- sembly of the U. N. President Nkrumah bluntly stated one‘ of the most important underlying conflicts in the Middle East. He urged Western powers to stop exploiting the oil resources of the Middle East, for “as long as these powers continue to ex« ploit the oil resources of thl Middle East on a competitive basis, the friction resulting from a clash of the economic and commercial interests is bound to endanger the peace of mankind." Without favouring either Israel or the Arab States. Ghana asked the United Nan tions to set up a committee to study and develop political man chinery which would make it impossible either for Israel to attack the Arab states or fot the Arab States to attack lsrael. The committee should ANKU— Cont. on Page 12 JEowpfcolom‘ 'A show of colors from shirts to shorts to everything a man wants to add color to his summer outlook! New bottle green. rich burgundy, faded blue, well, nos RElMER could go on and on. Looking ion the brighi side of summer, well, you'll iind ii ui aoa RElMER. BOB REIMER‘ CLOTHING