SCARLET AND ILACK Scarlet and Black Gallium. COLLEGE ‘Grinnell. Iowa A weekly newspaper published each Friday ol the col- lege yerr by the Gnuuell Committee on suiuen: Publica- lion-I. Laird n. Barber, chairman. Represented for national Advertising by National Advertising serme, inc, College Publishers Representative, )5 East sour Slreel. New York 22, N.Y. Second class postage Paid at Grinnell. Iowa. Subscripnon rnlc $4.50 per school year. , Lynn nemlcr Jim Mclnrym . Joli.- won “a (r 9“, Vi a canon . .. BUSINESS MANAGER . MANAGING colrou The north campus social chairman and soutll campus :oclal chairman asked house council and baffleboard members or a pledge to enforce open room policy last Sunday. Their reasons were tllat they could not take responsibility for an unenforced open room program this semester and that the college was in serious danger of losing the program if such a pledge were not made. Yesterday, the two chairman met with the social planning board to decide the fate of open rooms this semester. The rogram of open rooms was extended to all but the four lialls—Haines, South Younker, Dibble, and Langan—which failed to guarantee enforcement. The action has had some unfortunate aspects. First, there was no claim from the administration that college of- ficials were any more seriously concerned with enforcement procedures recently than in past semesters. Second, there was no pressure from the administration for a statement of this nature if open rooms were to be preserved; the possibility that a new dean of men might review the program next fall and the fact that no opens were sched- uled during the interim session (nor have there been any during past interims) were the only “threats.” Third, the action was poorly timed. House councils were iven only a few days to decide whether to sign the pledge. ad a similar proposal been raised later in the semester, after open roolns for this semester had been scheduled and assured, there would have been time to discuss and weigh the alternatives. Fourth, the purpose of the proposal was not explained adequately. The result was widespread uncertainty in many balls. Many house council members simply didn’t want to ledge themselves to be ubiquitous patrolmen. Others felt hat the pledge implied previous laxity ill enforcement Others didn‘t feel a pledge by this year’s house councils would guarantee a continuation of enforcement next year. The Board of Trustees, however, has never spelled out what steps would be requisite to making the present experi» mental program permanent. Perhaps the reason for the unfor' tunate present situation is that no one knows the exact mature qualities we are supposed to be displaying. ls student re- sponsibility to be measured by student ability to strictly en- force present rules? Should we enforce less strictly and see that rumors of the “irresponsible minority” aren’t spread? Or are there other qualities the administration and the Board of Trustees would like us to manifest? Most students want open rooms to continue; at present no one is sure of what we are supposed to do to insure their continuation. J W Students tend to be very short-sighted when they look [or the answer to Grinnell’s open dorm policy. Although they can say a great deal concerning the situation, the attitude prevails that the less done about it the better. The head social chairman of North and South campus must be applauded for what appears to be outstanding courage along with an impressive amount of insight. They were not afraid to admit that their program would most likely fail to function properly under existing conditions. Neither did they hide the fact. that responsible action involved positive student enforcement. Theirs was a lonely action of self- respollsihility. ‘ Students were shocked, at first, that they were being called upon to act. Many had failed to acquaint themselves with the concept that positions of leadership demanded more than the acceptance of pUSlt10n#f01‘ in the past year there have been many accepting positions, and few giving leadership. The idea of students affirming that they would take that responsibility of enforcing open dorms caused a lot of static across campus. But, by the end of the week the majority of students had indicated that they were willing to take the responsibility for their positions in a new effort to enforce the open dorm policy. If such action can be carried out, it will add to the value of the policy itself and will undoubtedly solve some of its problems. Perhaps in time it will lead to an expanded and improved program. Those who refused to affirm a position of enforcement and gave no reason for this refusal were able to lose them- selves in lofty phrases about the demands of the proposition, or about self made theories on rules in general. (This does not include those halls which didn’t sign the o iginal state- ment out drew up propositions of their own indicating their desire to continue enforcement.) But those refusing to sign any document could not hide the simple facts. Their refusal illustrated that these individuals were not willing to direct, themselves toward the responsible action that their positions represented. Friday. Februory I4 Letters to the Editor Abernathy Relates Editorial on Interim Session and 11A T0 the Editor: The editorial in the last 8&3 seemed to carry its thrust along two main lines: (1) The underclassmen (freshmen and sophomores) feel little incen- tive or necessity to study dur< ing the interim session, since there are no individually ogient— ed interests; (2) the possible interests of the juniors are con» slructed by the requirements of the JLA exam. In both cases the result is a wasted interim because of a lack of individual focus in the session itself. I would suggest rather that there may be a lack of individual focus in the individual himself. Dr. Kuntz’s letter last week offers the answer to point l~ “The job of learning to be your own boss. . . . is difficult,” Col- lege is the place to learn both the good and the bad of wasted time; we should stress the promise of the interim. With respect to point 2, 1 think the editorial has gone awry. The JLA syllabus does not restrain interests; indeed, its value lies precisely in its wide applicability, its possibil- ity, its openness. In terms of the purposes of the examina- tion, this year’s syllabus was, in my opinion, very good. Essential elements of Tom Fullmer / Miscellany and Digression This past week the North and South Campus Social Chair- men have proposed a new ap- proach to rule enforcement which could set a precedent for not only the Grinnell can-l,» pus but perhaps for all socie- ties which experience problems in rule enforcement. The social chairmen have run up against the impossbility of the contin- uation of the openrdorm pro- gram in the light of the failure of students to live by and en- force the rules under which the program was set up. As a last ditch effort to save the openrdorm program, they have distributed a pledge to be signed by the members of the house councils and baffleboards of each hall. By signing the pledge these students would agree to accept thalr responsi- bility for enforcing the open- dorm rules as listed in the stu» dent handbook. Thus all problems concerning enforcement would be solved by the signing of a pledge which would commit 'the signees to Carry out the jobs which they have previously been selected to fulfill. Tile pos- sibilities for this type or ap proach are almost unlimited. I would suggest that, as a three schemes of order could be mastered in two or three days' reading; the lectures giv» on were adequate to cement the ideas and to suggest the possi- bilities inherent in the ideas. The bulk of the preparatory task demanded Creative and imaginative understanding of previously learned knowledge as related to new categories of historical importance. The task not only permitted but also de manded some individually ini- tiated focus. A student with ideas about his major academic interests and their relation to the currents in intellectual his- tory should have been well pre pared. The interim session pro- vided the opportunity and the incentive for an imaginative widening of personal interests. it is important that there were no correct answers to the exam; students with a sense of intellectual continuity should have completed the test easily. if the junior student desires to he liberally educated, then the interim and exam were oppor- tunities: It seems that academic de- sire is present in students with a sense of their own individual focus. The focus and corres- the pending desire must come from safeguard, pledges might be distributed to these same peo ple which would pledge them to uphold their obligations to en- force thc regulations of the open-dorm program. If this plan succeeds in sav- ing the open dorm program it might also be used whenever students feel enforcement of other rules might be desirable. Pledges might be distributed which deal with fireworks, liquor, or quiet hours which would pledge the house counr oils and baffleboards to enforce these or any other rules which appear in the handbook. A more radical step would be to have all students sign pledges obligating them not to break specific rules listed in the handbook. This Would mean that agencies for student en- forcement could be done away with, On second thought, the lack of student enforcement would not be a radical change at all. Just imagine the tremendous effect such a pledging program could have in solving problems of all Societies. Corruption of the police could be solved by having all policemen sign a FULLMER— Continued on Page 5 responsible people on the spot. Perhaps it was an unusual place for them to find themselves, but the reaction has been more than interesting. It speaks not only to individual prob- lems of leadership on campus, but also to the overall com- munity “problems" of Gl-innell. Let’s hope that at least a substantial part of the student body willing to comlnit itself to responsible leadership will follow up with responsrble Let’s face it! The action of the social chairmen put action. Ll) within the student. If that atti- tude is lacking, then most 0! Grinnell‘s highest values (in- cluding the interim) are prob ably wasted, The further issue (implicit in the editorial) is how can the student acquire individual focus and a desire for a liberal edu- cation? I have no answer. I said, however, that if a sludellt desires to be liberally educated. then the interim is valuable. It is invalid to undercut the worth of the interim by porno ing out that some students are not individually focused. The solution to a lack of this kind of attitude lies on a deeper level than changing or scrapping the interim. Bill Abernathy Students Suggest Leaders, Citizens Respond By Doing To the Editor: The AWS Board and thl CofHP were this week asked to Sign a pledge stating that they would, from now on, enforce the open dorms policy. when this statement was passed out, it was asked how it could be re- written so it would “ring bet- ter" with the administration. It was also made clear that the signature of the president on this document does not in any " way obligate him to consider enforcement of any other rules. Maybe the time to stuff ‘ln‘ boxes is over and the time to act is overdue. The concepts of citizen and leaders have gone from our community and need to be revived. The enforced policy of the Grinnell community is L0 let anything occur so long as it does not visibly and directly in- jure another persons. The con- cepts of Grinnell College, acar demic community, and society do not enter our minds any more. Let us try to be citizens in the largest sense, ie. pre- serve ond protect the ideals. which include the rules, of the community. “As a starter it is suggested that all known violators be re- ported and dealt with in the institutionalized manner. Fur~ that, it is suggested that the members of the community carry out their responsibility ' m that community. Responsi- bility is something you do. Allen Egloff David Golden Plan Discussion Dr. Howard Burkle and the Reverend Robert De'wey or First Congregational Church in Grinnell will engage in a panel discus'smn of “Adieism and Faith” in Younker Lounge at 7 o'clock on Monday evening. There will be an opponunily lor students to question and coln< ment upon the ideas presenled. Everyone is welcome.