EridaynMay 4. I962

CAMPUS INQUIRER

Views expressed
on nuclear testing 1

l
l
l
l
l
l

SCARLET AND BLACK

Page Three

 

Ore/rests concert is Varied and colorful”

by Nancy Game

Last weekend's “Ol‘cllesis in

:Cotlccrt” provided a \‘Zil‘lcd and

Bull Savage, interviewer

Question: What do you think
or the resumption oi atmos-
pherie nuclear testing by the ,
United States? . l

.3318 Furnish:
pointed out,

lcolorful
‘,pantoinimc
1many high spots and tow weak
,iucsscs.
received by its audience.

program of dance and
The concert had

and was generally wcll

It is felt, however, that the

“As lids bccnllack of familiarity ot the audi-
this may be the ieiicc with dance as a medium ot

“last” series of tests conductedlartistic expression was 1.65pm].
by the United States. It haslsiblc tor the poor reaction to

been ale years since the US did “Moving,”
any atmospheric testing, while is” or

which, in the opiilr

this reviewer, was the

Russia finished her, last series :most ol-iginal'and exciting nuin.
less than a year asO- Kennedy’s iber in the show. The four dance

administration has

tried to
with Russia banning atmosphei»
ic tests ard started its series
only attci- being turned down
again The UN. passed a resume
tioii against resumption by‘thvcll
Us, and national tooling isii

exactly unanimous in favor o

it, so you have to assume the,
benefits to be gained will ottset
the adverse publicity — that the,
question has been carefully:
considered by people who have,
all the facts." 1

Bill Epstcii i think the test .
are a grave ciior which will
cause many to question any at-,
tempts at peace made by that
US.‘ in the future. For any r
lief of present-tensions we wil
have not only to make proposals
but demonstrate our good faith.
etc. The tests, of course, dont
do this.”

Jim Stoddart: “Because 1 have
seen no definite proof that tall-
out from such tests does harm
to the human gene and will
distort the human race, I would
lavor the continuance of nuclear
testing. So long as it provides
needed scientific iniormation and
is not used for military pur—
poses only, this testing is nec-
essary. When its results are no
longer scientitieally valuable
and are used solely for man-
klnd’s ‘destruction, such testing
is insane." ,
iHeidi Fitton: “I am against
atmospheric testing.”

Janet Rigg: “it is my persons
al opinion that the resumption
of nuclear testing is wrong on

all counts. 1 can see no possible ‘

political Justification tor cal-rye
iiig on testing which in the past
has led to Nagasaki and Hiro-
shima. If anyone has any
doubts, i suggest they refer to
the pictures in the library base.
ment," g

llave Liglithourne; “Regardless
of the issues involved, the news
was the most thoroughly de-
pressing imaginable. The only
more catastrophic event would
be the end of mankind, a thing
which this heralds."

Chris Greene: “I am not 0137’
posed to IL The reason i am
not opposed is that any bombs
we would set off in the ammo
sphere would not put very much
fall—out in the atmosphere.”

Marilee Hansen: “Personally I
don’t have the knowledge to dc-
cide whether they have mado'
the right decision. I'm not one
of those fanatics it o have do
cided that economic torccs are
making these decisions. 1 don’t‘
like the idea but the e must be!
some good reasons.”

Lowell Huckett; “I am for re—
suming. I believe that if we
don’t resume we will be in a
position where Russia will have
the -advantagc as a esult of
their series The deci on is a,
tough one because if we test
it will be good propaganda for
Russia."

Bill Abernathy- “I am in fav-
or oi it. it would be national
suicide in the face of an oppos»
‘illg power if we did not re
sume. As to the argument that
we have enough bombs now —!
in my opinion, we have to keep
testing to constantly make al~
lowancc ror advancements in
tccnnology which may put us
behind and result in our down-l
fall.”

 

'iil

Advertise in the Scarlet alld‘

mack. Rates per column inch:

.40 college; .50 town; .70 action-
al.

tul,
ing.

repeatedly lcrs were able to create fascinate
tablish an agreement iiig patterns and Tomas oi mover

‘ment by the
of their
Wlemcl‘s’
Bobbi
batics. Betsy sni-ague's graccfm

» stic‘ itixaposition
individual styles: Rae

athletic quickness,
Mahnke's smooth acro:

cvelopment 01 Clean, clear
illes, and Sandy Seeders beauti—
internally motivated danc»

There were several other
particularly good numbers in
the show. Sue Browns choreog-
raphy and solo work lor the
“Spiritual“ provided the fouli—
dations ior what turned out
to be an excellent opening
number for the show. This, as
well as the “Mind Bull" dance
became iorceful because of the
emphatic rhythmic nuali'cs
which were developed, How—
ever, is the latter, the use oi
platiorms and the isolating
oi tragments appeared to be
somewhat artiiicial and title
necessary in the eiiort to
dramatize in dance.

Though Ken Hart and Carrie

 

,. _“;a/i\|:_
71%: qpayff 73: \g/Mgmta/

taste of Spl‘ll‘lgtlmc...50 soil tllld refreshing. Pufi

Vaughan furnished
inn. e for Devolution" (compose
ed by Barbara Bari-cit), it is iclt
that the idea at chaos could
have been abstracted somewhat
more a the literal represents
tioii of chaos in this dance gave
the effect of too busy a stage
[or tllC observer to watch all at
once. This quality of literal lil—
tel‘pretatlon which at times
seemed a bit artificial permeated
the “Trilogy” dance also, though
the reading of the poems nan
done well, and the meanings
communicated especially graph—
ically by Gail Zivln

It is good to see boys dancing
too, but the “El. Cctem" num.
ber tended to be awkward and
stiltcd. anti somehow, a little
ridiculous in the unequal abil-
' cs or the participating danc-
crs.

Although this reviewer did
not entirely understand the ace
lion of “Third level,” it was cvie
dent that this was a well some
posed and well executed some
position with a great deal or
emotional impact. The reversal
ot the stable triangle {oi-iii iii
the dance was good, and the
repctitivc “chorus" of the music
gave unity to the work and c1-
lowed the dancers to make their
patterns or emotion, idea and
movement more vi» d,

Marcy Mulliczil‘i’s “Solo
Clown" was a delighttul dance
The classic sad—happy clown was
given a trash, gently humorous
treatment by Miss Mullican: an
endearing almost childlike quale
ity was conveyed by her light
and agile dancing to the music
of Mozart, The other solo in

 

refresh
softens/’ev

Dracmel, was pleasant to watch
and added variety to the cone
ccrt, as it was less interpretive
of the music than were most 01
the dances

The pantomimcs in the coil-
cert wci-c intriguing and gave
audience members a chance to
sec different methods of lntl'epl‘er
tatioii used by actors and (lance
ers.

The “Hamlet" pantomime
was hilarious. The one eaturcs
supplied by Mike Burr, Pet
Colioii, Leigh Tracy, and Phil
Powell were particularly well
done. However, it is ielt that
the humor of this number
came from the excellence and
inventiveness or the pcl'furmr
ers themselves, and that the
script itsell, though read as
well as possible. did little to
enhance the humor oi the pair-
tomimci

The short paiitomiiiics by Phil
Baliclr and Mike Burr \ erc also

remely funny, Buris bcalle
tilul sense of timing is again
notable It is interesting that the
humor that the audience saw in
sonic ol the other short panto-
mimos (n hen they could under-
stand what was being done)
seemed to be lost, rather than
sharpened, when . the originals
were abstracted.

"Dancing is" was perhaps not
the best choice toi- concluding a
successful concert. The guitar
and bass music by Sam Schu-
iiiaii, Peter Cohoii. and Keith
Felton was certainly more than
adequate. but the dances lacked

precision, and were. generally

 

 

% $22.». .;

after pili'

 

es yountasté .

ery prf,

interesting cludcd iii the program, by Pam speaking, not \el‘y imaginati

This reviewer was much i
pressed with the high dash
of the technical aspects of ti
procluctio Scone changes w
quick, clficient. and aceompl
ed with a minimum of distl'r
tion to the audience, light or-
werc correct, the sound was c
tectively controlled. and
tunies and makeup were appro—
pi into. The proycctions used 2:; ,
settings for (his plogram we
noticeablv less ambitious t.
last ycai s. (oi-clicsis was t.
gioup to use projectrl

sccncry at Griiinell 7 in Darcy
gym, no less), and though silv-
tive results were achieved tll
year, it is felt that an env'pn-
ment tor the dances could ha‘ .
been suggested a little in
clearly and at the same i
more subtly by more extells ,e
use of proioctions, rather
by the blatant plainrcolo
lighting of the eyeloraiiia.

in viewing the concert
whole, one must note the \‘
planned and coordinated p
cramming and direction 7 M.»
Bstty Voei‘tman dld a very co "7
petcnt Job. This reviewers
pressioii or dance at ci-innell,
after seeing the 1962 "Oi‘cl‘t
in Concert," is that we have
many highly skilled dance-
and a few who are not o
skilled, but also possess a h
dcgree of imagination, lnsigl‘t,
originality. and a desire to co 'l-
municate through dance. Th
latter few, who are able to c
fine the all»illlpol‘tant relation
ship between meaning and mo
ment, even when movement‘
a meaning in itself, have made
this year’s concert something o
remember, '

A Stilelllrclgarette brings you the
.ptlck after pack

Salem smokes fresh and flavorful every tillle’. Smoke refreshed. .sllloke Salem

derri‘filt

wows—An ,

er, too a.

punt

finite 3W“