TEC 154 2014S, Class 26: Biotechnology (2)
==========================================

_Overview_

* Preliminaries.
    * Admin.
    * Questions.

Preliminaries
-------------

### Admin

* Today's note takers: TD and DS
* Reading for Friday: Read the "Launching the Innovation Renaissance" e-book 
  from the beginning through the section "The critical need for patent reform."
* Upcoming extra credit:
    * Convocation, Wednesday, The Sixth Extinction
    * Talk on Science Writing, Today at 4:15 pm
    * Technology in the Liberal Arts Symposium, Thursday, various times

### Questions

Key Points from TD
------------------

Key Points from DS
------------------

Dr. Robertson's Notes
---------------------

### New products under development

* Foods with improved nutrition - Golden Rice
* Edible vaccines
* Antibodies produced in plants

### Plants and Animals as Protein Factories

Products produced in tissues or milk - much cheaper to produce than
in bacteria or animal cells grown in bioreactors.

### Xeno-Transplantation

Use of organ transplants from non-human speciies, primates or pigs,
for instance

### Animal Cloning

Dolly and many others (Copy Cat, Tabouli and Bab Ganoush)

### Problems

* Legal issues - Percy Schmeiser (Canadian canola grower) vs. Monsanto
* Contamination of food supply by crops not approved for human consumption -
  Starlkink corn in taco shells
* Weeds developing resistance to Round-up - serious problem today
* Gene flow into related weeds or into other fields of same crop that may
  be organically grown
* Bt - harm to non-target species like Monarch butterflies

SR's Live Notes
---------------

Newer developments - Things not yet available commercially

* Things from Monday were mostly for the benefit of the producer,
  not the consumer.
* Affect the consumer mostly in the consumers are eating these foods
  with altered composition.
* If you look at the genetically engineered foods, you see that Canola and
  Soybeans have been altered for different kinds of lipids.
* Similarly, potatoes that have higher starch content to make better
  McFries.

Golden Rice

* One of the first geneng products developed "without commercial interest"
* GR contains higher levels of beta carotine
* Beta carotine leads to vitamin A
* Lack of vitamin A leads to blindness
* Lots of people in the world
* Researchers thought we could engineer into rice a gene for vitamin
* Publically funded
* Ingo Potrykus - Swiss researcher, "His brain child" 
* Peter Beyer - German researcher
* Interesting/complex because it requires several genes working in sequence
  in a pathway.
* They were successful
* Intended for developing world, intended as good
* Opposed by Greenpeace and others, more or less from the start
    * Worry that it's a thin edge of a wedge of big agricultural and
      big pharma getting into countries and such
* Another issue: This uses patented technologies.  Patent holders
  allowed researchers to develop, but once it was to be commercialized,
  they wanted their money.  
    * Amazingly, Monsanto donated its patent rights
* Started to work with Syngenta (I think), who agreed to give freely
  (at cost?) to developing world with the understanding
* Syngenta improved it by about a factor of 20.  One bowl makes 60%
  of the daily RDA of vitamin A.
* Controversy still continues.
* The Pope blessed a backet of golden rice.  (Is this a big deal?  Who
  knows.)
* Phillipine government is ready to begin testing.
* Also issue of adapting to different varieties of rice, since their
  are different varieties of rice that do best in different locations.
* Question: Do people address the cultural issues of the meaning of
  the color of rice?  Dr. Robertson is not sure.

Plants as Protein Factories

* Sometimes called *Pharming*
    * Why?  Normally because we're producing the proteins for pharmaceuticals
    * Finding ways to make it cheaper to make these proteins 
    * Traditionally produced with bacteria; ends up being very expensive
       * Keeping the bacteria "sterile" is important (you don't want
         contamination)
    * Using animal cells is also an approach; even more expensive than
      bacteria
* Monstanto (as you might expect) came up with a way to use corn to
  make copies of proteins
    * You give them your gene
    * They put it into corn
    * (Not clear who grows the corn)
    * "Goodness knows, we know how to grow corn easily/cheaply."
    * New company "Integrated Protein Technology" or IPT.
    * But it seems to fold.
* Corn is not the only plant you can do this with.  Tobacco is also
  used.
* Medicago acted like it was close to making the commercial market.
    * Robertson has not heard of any product from anyone making it to
      market.
* "Plantibodies"

Transgenic Animals

* Process is similar to what you do with plants.
* Example: Chinese/American hogs
    * Chinese hogs have bigger litters
    * American hogs have more meat
* Still use direct injection, in the zygotes.  Grow slightly, then
  implant into mother.
    * Low percentage yield, but often the only approach
* Alternative: Use modified viruses (retroviruses), which transmit part
  of their genome into the host genome.
    * Infect few-cell embryos (e.g., 8-cell embryos)
* Idea: Genetically engineer animals so that compounds of interest
  come from milk.  (Goats, Cattle, Sheep, even pigs (in the picture))
* Has been done for some time.  See ad for Pharm. Proteins Limited (the
  folks who cloned Dolly)
    * PPL went bankrupt
    * No evidence that they made it to the commercial market

Xeno-transplantation

* The use of organs from a non-human source for human transplant
* Makes up for the huge deficiency in needed organs
* There are some kinds of swine whose organs are about the same size
  as human organs.
* Issue: The organ would be recognized as "non self" and then 
  attacted.
* Goal: Change the markers on the cells.
* PPL were among the people trying to do all of this
* Gene-knockout pigs
* Once they created the gene-knockout pigs, they were able to clone them.
* Note: Getting rid of the main marker is not enough, but it's a big start.
* They've started testing (e.g., transplanting from pigs to baboons)
    * Organs currently last for a few months

Cloning Dolly (and others

* Has been an interesting field to watch
* Dr. Robertson assumed that we'd never be able to clone mammals
* Given that we turn off genetic information during cell specialization,
  most scientists were surprised that the info could be turned on.
* Plants can be cloned easily form single cells.
* Background: Tutorial on embryos
    * Zygote contains all of the genes to make the creature
    * As cell division occurs, the first cells all contains the
      same genetic code.  Each cell is identical to the zygote,
      until we're up to sixteen cells.
    * After that stage, each cell strats differntiating.
    * Up until that stage, you can separate the cells and treat each one
      as a zygote.
    * So you can save and freeze and reuse cells.
    * "Embryo twinning"
* Easiest way to clone: Split the embryo when there are few enough cells.
    * Slip into the eggs
* Back to Iowa: There is a company in Sioux County Iowa, Trans Ova, that 
  is the premier company in this stuff
    * They do a lot of different things
    * E.g., they can "sex" sperm with 99% accuracy
    * It doesn't seem like they use embryo twinning
* Cloned bull won Iowa State Fair
    * Some controversy

The hard way to make an embryo: Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer (SCNT)

* You need the embryo in order to do embryo twinning
* What if you have an adult, instead?
    * You need to turn a cell into an embryo
* Dolly: Born in 1996, not announced until 1997.
* During lifetime, produced 4-6 offspring
* Strategy:
   * Mammary cell donor (the animal we are cloning): Grabbed mamary cell
   * Took egg cell from ovary.  Removed nucleus
   * Fuse cells.  Let it grow.  It's like a zygote.
   * Grow in culture.
   * Grow for a bit into an early embryo
   * Implant into uterus of a third sheep (the surrogate mother)
* Was the first to work out of 256 attempts
* In 2002, develped a sheep.  Rare at that age.  Questions of whether
  that's a relate of cloning.
* In 2003, euthanized after getting a lung tumor.  (Not unusual.)
* But we've seen some interesting issues with the offspring of cloned
  animals since then.
* Researchers in texas cloned a cat (2001)
* "Genetic Savings and Clone" - $50K to clone your cat.
    * Dropped to $25K
    * Now out of business
* It appears that cloning cats is much easier than cloning dogs.
* South Korean lab claimed to clone human embryos
    * That was proven to be false
    * But the cloning of dogs in that lab was successful.  It costs
      $150K to $240K.
* Lots of laws intended to prevent cloning of human
* The whole stem cell area is part of an attempt to help with therapy
    * Embryonic stem cells are best

Problems and Issues

* Contamination of other crops.  
* Contamination story one
    * Percy Schmeiser was a farmer who was not using Roundup-ready canola
    * He discovered that his canola had acquired that gene.
    * He knew that it was illegal to cell it, but he did save the seed
      (which he had always done)
    * Monsanto sued.  They won.  He did not have the permission to replant
      the seed from his own plants.
* The StarLink case
    * Someone was testing things on shelves
    * Found Bt corn in taco shells and corn chips, Bt corn that had not
      been approved for human consumption.  (It had been approved for
      cattle feed.)
    * Issue: Accidentally got mixed into corn for human consumption.
    * "They lost buckets of money trying to recover the corn"
* A known danger: Nut genes getting into things
* Many countries have concerns about growing GE crops and then selling
  those in the EU, which has a long-standing embargo against GE crops.
