title: Redoing mini-projects section: handouts

Redos

As you have heard, the mastery grading approach we use in CSC-151 permits you to redo mini-projects you do not complete at a satisfactory level, sometimes at the cost of some tokens. There are also some additional policies for redos.

• You must limit yourself to the aspects of Scheme/Scamper we had covered at the time of the project.
• You must provide information for the grader on what you’ve changed.

Limiting your use of new Scheme features

As the semester progresses, we will learn many new features of Scheme. The assignments are designed to challenge you to solve the problems using the knowledge you have at the time they were assigned. As you might expect, we’ll learn new techniques that make many parts of the earlier projects much simpler.

When submitting a redo, you must limit yourself to the aspects of Scheme we had covered by the time the project was do.

The CHANGES.rkt file

To ease our graders’ workload, we ask that you add a section at the top of your submission in which you detail the changes you have made since the last assignment.

• A header giving the basic information.
• Information about the previous version you submitted. (E.g., “I was unable to submit the original assignment” or “I submitted the original version but not the first redo.”)
• A list of all the major issues in that previous version—including those noted within the program code, those listed in the comments section, and the rubric items that were not completed—as well as a summary of how you have addressed them.

; Mini-Project 3, Second Redo
; River Smith
; 2025-03-17
; 
; Prior version: Mini-Project 3, Original
;   I submitted the original, but not the first redo.
;   I realize that this means that I won't get more than an M.
; 
; Issues I've addressed
; 
; * Unclear documentation for a few procedures.
;   I've now added documentation for `tally-images` and `combine-all`.
; 
; * Failure to cite laboratory materials.
;   I've added a citation to the laboratory materials to the introductory
;   comments. I've also separated the materials from each lab and put
;   a short comment before the section with those materials.
;   
; * `make-image`.
;   My `make-image` procedure did not work correctly. I believe that
;   I've fixed that issue. It now passes all of the tests, including
;   the three-star tests.
; 
; * Style
;   I think I've fixed all of my stylistic issues. The graders noted
;   that I used nested `if` expressions rather than `cond` blocks. I've
;   fixed that both where they noted it and also in `combine-all`. I've
;   also been careful to reindent with Ctrl-I before submitting.