#lang racket (provide (all-defined-out)) (require csc151) (require 2htdp/image) ;; CSC-151-01 (Fall 2021) ;; Lab: More Fun with Lists ;; Authors: YOUR NAMES HERE ;; Date: THE DATE HERE ;; Acknowledgements: ;; ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS HERE #| In this lab, you and your partner will practice manipulating lists using the big-three higher-order functions: map, filter, and reduce. There are five exercises; here's the division. Exercise 1: A-Side Exercise 2: B-Side Exercise 3: A-Side Exercise 4: B-Side Exercise 5: Both; Not to be turned in. The person with the problem description should drive and their partner should navigate. Again, make sure to be good partners and focus completely on solving the current problem together rather than working ahead on your own. Also: Don't forget our new "start of session". Chat with your partner about working habits and strengths. Maybe share something interesting about yourself |# #| A |# ; +----------------------------+------------------------------------- ; | Exercise 1: Do a big thing | ; +----------------------------+ #| Complete each of the definitions that manipulate ex-1-list in various sorts of ways using one or more of the big three functions. You may also use the other standard library functions for lists (e.g., length) when appropriate. |# (define ex-1-list (list 25 25 23 5 21 20 20 18 10 1 22 21)) ; Increments the value of each element of the list `ex-1-list` by 5 (define ex-1-list-adjusted "") ; Keeps only the elements of the list that are greater than 10. (define ex-1-list-filtered "") ; Computes the average of the list (Hint: this computation is more ; than just a single reduce call!) (define ex-1-list-average "") #| B |# ; +----------------------------------+------------------------------- ; | Exercise 2: Higher-order corners | ; +----------------------------------+ #| Suppose we want to add 5 to every element of a list. Many of you tried the following. > (define numbers (list 3 1 4 1 5 9 2 6)) > (define numbers-plus-5a (map + numbers 5)) a. Why doesn't that work? |# #| b. As we hope you've learned, you can use `section` to help with this problem. Write an expression using `section` that adds five to each element of `numbers`. |# (define numbers (list 3 1 4 1 5 9 2 6)) (define numbers-plus-five-b "") #| c. Suppose you had not learned `section`. There's still at least two other ways to to add five to each element of a list. Come up with two, at least one of which uses the three-parameter `map`. |# (define numbers-plus-five-c1 "") (define numbers-plus-five-c2 "") #| d. Which of those definitions do you most prefer? Why? |# #| A |# ; +------------------------------------+----------------------------- ; | Exercise 3: Party people revisited | ; +------------------------------------+ #| One of the things that `map` allows us to do is perform repetitive behavior. We'll demonstrate this by generalizing one of the images we created in our first lab on decomposition and then using our list functions to generate repeated instances of that images. |# #| a. Recall in the first exercise of our decomposition lab you created an image that consisted of five people with party hats. Using this code as a base, write a function `(party-person scale)` that draws a single person, *i.e.*, a person with a party hat but scales the person's width and height by a factor of `scale`. For example: + If `scale` is `1`, then the image is drawn at its original dimensions. + If `scale` is `0.5`, then the image is drawn at half size. + If `scale` is `2`, then the image is drawn at 2x size. |# (define party-person (lambda (scale) {??})) #| b. Using `party-person` define a *list of images* called `party-list` that consists of six party people scaled in the following manner: 1.5x 1x 0.25x 2x 1.75x 1x (Hint: start with a list of these scaling factors as fractional numbers. What functions can we use in combination to transform this list of factors into a list of images?) |# (define party-list "TODO: fill me in!") #| c. You might notice that the type of `party-list` isn't quite an image. To see this, attempt to rotate `party-list` using the `rotate` function. In the space below, report the error you receive and in a sentence or two explain what the problem is! |# #| d. To fix the problem, we need to combine the images of `party-list` into a single image. To do this, we should use `beside` to place each person beside each other. However, try calling `beside` on `party-list`. This should result in yet another error! In the space below, report the error and in a sentence or two explain the problem! |# #| e. It turns out that the fix is to use the `apply` function which takes a function `f` and a list of values as input and returns the result of applying `f` to the values of the list. Use `apply` to complete the definition of `party` below and verify that it produces what you expect. |# (define party "TODO: FILL ME IN!") #| f. It's also possible to do this with `reduce` rather than `apply`. (At least it should be.) Try doing so. |# (define party-f "TODO: FILL ME IN!") #| B |# ; +------------------------------------+----------------------------- ; | Exercise 4: Exercises in reduction | ; +------------------------------------+ #| a. What does the following procedure do? |# (define combine (lambda (s1 s2) (string-append s1 " and " s2 " and " s1))) #| b. What value do you expect to get for the following expressions? |# (define combine-2 (reduce combine (list "A" "B"))) (define combine-1 (reduce combine (list "A"))) (define combine-3-left (reduce-left combine (list "A" "B" "C"))) (define combine-3-right (reduce-right combine (list "A" "B" "C"))) (define left-and-right (equal? combine-3-left combine-3-right)) #| c. What values do you expect for all-the-same below? Why? |# (define combine-abcde-1 (reduce combine (list "A" "B" "C" "D" "E"))) (define combine-abcde-2 (reduce combine (list "A" "B" "C" "D" "E"))) (define combine-abcde-3 (reduce combine (list "A" "B" "C" "D" "E"))) (define all-the-same (and (equal? combine-abcde-1 combine-abcde-2) (equal? combine-abcde-1 combine-abcde-3))) #| d. What do you take as the main lessons of this exercise? |# #| AB |# ; +----------------------+------------------------------------------- ; | Submitting your work | ; +----------------------+ #| Congratulations on finishing this lab! To turn in your work: a. If you're working online, combine the two parts into a single file. b. Ensure that your file runs properly. c. Make sure you save as `lists-more.rkt` using File -> Save Other -> Save Definitions As Text... d. Send this completed file to your partner for their records. e. Submit this final file to Gradescope. Make sure, if appropriate, to submit your work as a group submission and include your partner in the submission. |# ; +------------------------------------------------------+----------- ; | Exercise 5: A short introduction to textual analysis | ; +------------------------------------------------------+ #| You do not need to turn in this exercise, and you probably won't complete it during class. However, you should do the exercise on your own (or with another person) to make sure that you understand the parts. |# #| Now, that we've gotten our feet wet with lists and the big three, let's see what we can do! We'll use our knowledge of list processing to perform some basic analysis of texts. This sort of analysis is the "bread and butter" of the digital humanities, and we will be exploring in more detail in the coming weeks. |# #| a. First off, we need to find a text to analyze. A rich repository of freely available texts can be found on Project Gutenberg: https://gutenberg.org/ From Project Gutenberg, we'll do some basic analysis of The Wonderful Wizard of Oz by L. Frank Baum. Download a copy of the book as a plaintext file from this URL: https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/43936/pg43936.txt Make sure to put the file in the same directory that you saved this file in. We'll talk more about file processing in a future class, but for now, we'll provide you with the code to read this text file into a list of words. Once you have downloaded the book and placed it in the proper directory, uncomment the line below and verify in the interactions pane with `length` that the file contains around 44000 words. (probably a few less) |# ; (define wizard-words (file->words "pg43936.txt")) #| b. Hopefully you noticed that `wizard-words` is a _large_ list! If you happen to accidentally type `wizard-words` in the interactions pane, DrRacket will happily try to print all of the list's contents. If this happens, click the "Stop/Kill" button in the top right corner a few times to stop execution of the program. To get an example of what the list contains, we can use the `(take l n)` function from the standard library which returns the first `n` elements of list `l`. In the space below, report what the first 20 words of the text file are. |# #| c. Whoops! You should have found that the first 20 words don't look like the start of the Wizard of Oz. Go ahead and open up `pg43936.txt` in DrRacket. Even though the file is not a Racket source file, DrRacket is happy to open it up since it is plain text. Many data sources we'll look at will contain a *preamble* of information before we get to the good stuff. It is easiest to *cleanse* our data file manually so that this preamble does't get in the way of our analysis. Delete the start of the text up until the title: The WONDERFUL WIZARD OF OZ Save the file, reload your source file (so that we update `wizard-words` with your changes), and rerun your `take` expression and verify that the first 20 words of the book are: '("The" "WONDERFUL" "WIZARD" "OF" "OZ" "BY" "L" "Frank" "Baum" "W" "W" "Denslow" "Illustration" "Geo" "M" "Hill" "Co" "New" "York" "INTRODUCTION") |# #| d. Write an expression to grab the next 20 words of the book. |# (define second-twenty-words "") #| e. Now let's analyze the book! _The Wizard of Oz_ features five main characters: + Dorothy + Toto + Scarecrow + Tin Woodman + Cowardly Lion While Dorothy is clearly the main character, who are the most important among the other characters? One way to view this question computationally or in a data-driven fashion is to count the number of occurrences of each character in the text. Complete the definitions below to count the number of occurrences of each character in The Wizard of Oz. In the space below, report the counts and who you believe is the most important character besides Dorothy, computationally speaking! (Hint 1: I recommend perusing the book before you write your code to see how each character is referenced.) (Hint 2: One way to perform this computation is to rely on filter to get rid of all the text other than relevant occurrences of a character's name!) (Hint 3: If you have trouble finding any results with some characters, keep in mind that the list you have is a *list of words* which might require you to compromise a bit in what you search for in the text.) Counts + Dorothy: + Scarecrow: + Woodman: + Lion: |# (define dorothy-occurrences "TODO: fill me in!") (define toto-occurrences "TODO: fill me in!") (define scarecrow-occurrences "TODO: fill me in!") (define woodman-occurrences "TODO: fill me in!") (define lion-occurrences "TODO: fill me in!") #| f. If you have extra time, try to come up with your own questions you can ask of the _The Wizard of Oz_ text and try to answer them using lists! Your questions don't have to be complicated, e.g., you might ask what the longest word in the book is or whether Dorothy is ever referenced by her full name. You might not be able to answer the question directly in code, but you can certainly generate new information that can help you answer your question! |#