CSC151.02 2010S Functional Problem Solving : Labs

Laboratory: Numeric Recursion

Summary: Although most of our prior experiments with recursion have emphasized recursion over lists, it is also possible to use other values as the basis of recursion. In this laboratory, you will explore the use of natural numbers (non-negative integers) as the basis of recursion.


Here is a template for the simplest kind of numeric recursive procedures.

(define recursive-proc
  (lambda (n)
    (if (zero? n)
        (combine n (recursive-proc (- n 1))))))

If you choose to use a local kernel, here is one common form.

(define recursive-proc
  (letrec ((kernel (lambda (so-far n)
                     (if (zero? n)
                         (kernel (update so-far n)
                                 (- n 1))))))
    (lambda (n)
      (kernel starting-value n))))

We can also use a kernel to count up from 1 to n. (A slight change lets you count up from 0 to n.)

(define recursive-proc
  (letrec ((kernel (lambda (so-far i n)
                     (if (> i n)
                         (kernel (update so-far i) (+ i 1) n)))))
    (lambda (n)
      (kernel starting-value 1 n))))


Make a copy of numeric-recursion-lab.scm, which contains important code from the reading.


Exercise 1: Termial, Revisited

Rewrite termial it so that the kernel is local.

Exercise 2: Counting Down

Define and test a recursive Scheme procedure, (count-down val), that takes a natural number as argument and returns a list of all the natural numbers less than or equal to that number, in descending order.

> (count-down 5)
(5 4 3 2 1 0)
> (count-down 0)

Note that you should use cons to build up the list.

Note also that you are better off writing this with direct recursion (the first pattern above), rather than using a helper procedure.

When you are finished, you may want to read the notes on this exercise.

Exercise 3: Filling Lists

Define and test a Scheme procedure, (value-replicate value count), that takes two arguments, the second of which is a natural number, and returns a list consisting of the specified number of repetitions of the first argument.

> (value-replicate "sample" 5)
("sample" "sample" "sample" "sample" "sample")
> (value-replicate 10 3)
(10 10 10)
> (value-replicate null 1)
> (value-replicate null 2)
(() ())
> (value-replicate "hello" 0)

Even if you know a built-in procedure to do this task, please implement value-replicate recursively.

When you are finished writing this procedure, compare it to the notes on this exercise and then add value-replicate to your Scheme library.

Exercise 4: Counting To

As you may recall, iota is a procedure that takes a natural number as argument and returns a list of all the natural numbers that are strictly less than the argument, in ascending order. As you've seen, the iota procedure is quite useful. Unfortunately, it does not come as part of standard Scheme. (We include it in MediaScheme because it is so useful.)

Implement and test your own version of iota. (You should not call the MediaScheme iota.)

For example,

> (my-iota 3)
(0 1 2)
> (my-iota 5)
(0 1 2 3 4)
> (my-iota 1)

Note that you will probably need to use a helper of some sort to write my-iota. You might use the traditional form of helper, which adds an extra parameter. You might also use a helper that simply computes the list in the reverse order. (Most students write a backwards version in the first attempt; instead of throwing it away, rename it and call it from my-iota.)

Exercise 5: Counting Between

You may recall the count-from procedure from the reading on recursion over natural numbers, which is available in the code for this lab.

a. What is the value of the call (count-from -10 10)?

b. Check your answer experimentally.

c. It is possible to implement count-from in terms of iota. The implementation looks something like the following.

(define count-from
  (lambda (lower upper)
     (map (lambda (n) (+ _____ n)) (iota _____))))

Finish this definition.

d. What do you see as the advantages and disadvantages of each way of defining count-from?

For Those Who Finish Early

Extra 1: The Nth Element

Write a procedure, (list-nth n lst), that extracts element n of a list. For example,

> (list-nth 5 (list "red" "orange" "yellow" "green" "blue" "indigo" "violet">))
> (list-nth 0 (list "red" "orange" "yellow" "green" "blue" "indigo" "violet">))

Even though this procedure does the same thing as list-ref, you should not use list-ref to implement it. Instead, your goal is to figure out how list-ref works, which means that you will need to implement this procedure using direct recursion.

Hint: When recursing, you will need to simplify the numeric parameter (probably by subtracting 1) and the list parameter (probably by taking its cdr).

Exercise 2: Computing List Prefixes

a. Define and test a recursive procedure, (list-prefix lst n), that returns a list consisting of the first n elements of the list, lst, in their original order. You might also think of list-prefix as returning all the values that appear before index n.

For example,

> (list-prefix (list "a" "b" "c" "d" "e") 3)
("a" "b" "c")
> (list-prefix (list 2 3 5 7 9 11 13 17) 2)
(2 3)
> (list-prefix (list "here" "are" "some" "words") 0)
> (list-prefix (list null null) 2)
(() ())
> (map rgb->color-name (list-prefix (map color-name->rgb (list "black" "white" "green") 1)) 

While your procedure has much the same purpose as list-take, you should not call list-take. Rather, your goal is to implement the procedure recursively.

b. Update your procedure to check appropriate preconditions. In particular, your procedure should signal an error if lst is not a list, if n is not an exact integer, if n is negative, or if n is greater than the length of lst.

Note that in order to signal such errors, you may want to take advantage of the husk-and-kernel programming style. You can use named let or letrec.

c. Compare your error messages for various invalid parameters with those given by list-take.

Extra 3: Taking Some More Elements

Rewrite list-prefix to use whichever of named let and letrec you didn't use in the previous exercise.


Notes on Exercise 2: Counting Down

Here's a possible solution to the problem. The base case is easy. If the number is zero, then the list of all non-negative numbers less than or equal to zero is the list that contains only zero.

    (if (zero? n)
        (list 0)

In the recursive case, we assume that we can compute the list of all numbers less than or equal to n-1. To get the complete list, we simply add n to the front.

        (cons n (count-down (- n 1)))

Putting it all together, we get

;;; Procedure:
;;;   count-down
;;; Parameters:
;;;   n, a non-negative integer
;;; Purpose:
;;;   Create a list of the form (n n-1 n-2 ... 3 2 1).
;;; Produces:
;;;   nums, a list
;;; Preconditions:
;;;   [No additional.]
;;; Postocnditions:
;;;   (length nums) = n+1
;;;   (list-ref nums i) = n-i for all i, 0 <= i <= n.
(define count-down
  (lambda (n)
    (if (zero? n)
        (list 0)
        (cons n (count-down (- n 1))))))

Return to the problem.

Notes on Exercise 3: Filling Lists

We begin by considering the base case. The last example gives a hint: If you want zero copies, you end up with the empty list.

    (if (zero? n)

Now, on to the recursive case. If we can create a list of n-1 copies, we can then create a list of n copies by prepending one more copy.

        (cons val (value-replicate val (- n 1)))

Putting it all together, we get

;;; Procedure:
;;;   value-replicate
;;; Parameters:
;;;   val, a Scheme value
;;;   n, a non-negative integer
;;; Purpose:
;;;   Create a list of n copies of val.
;;; Produces:
;;;   val-lst
;;; Preconditions:
;;;   [No additional]
;;; Postconditions:
;;;   (length val-lst) is n
;;;   (list-ref val-list i) is val for all i, 0 <= i < n
(define value-replicate
  (lambda (val n)
    (if (zero? n)
        (cons val (value-replicate val (- n 1))))))

Return to the problem.

Creative Commons License

Samuel A. Rebelsky,

Copyright (c) 2007-10 Janet Davis, Matthew Kluber, Samuel A. Rebelsky, and Jerod Weinman. (Selected materials copyright by John David Stone and Henry Walker and used by permission.)

This material is based upon work partially supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. CCLI-0633090. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License. To view a copy of this license, visit or send a letter to Creative Commons, 543 Howard Street, 5th Floor, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.