Fundamentals of Computer Science I (CS151.01 2006F)
[Skip to Body]
Primary:
[Front Door]
[Syllabus]
[Glance]
[Search]

[Academic Honesty]
[Instructions]
Current:
[Outline]
[EBoard]
[Reading]
[Lab]
[Homework]
Groupings:
[EBoards]
[Examples]
[Exams]
[Handouts]
[Homework]
[Labs]
[Outlines]
[Projects]
[Readings]
Reference:
[Scheme Report (R5RS)]
[Scheme Reference]
[DrScheme Manual]
Related Courses:
[CSC151.02 2006F (Davis)]
[CSCS151 2005S (Stone)]
[CSC151 2003F (Rebelsky)]
[CSC153 2004S (Rebelsky)]
This lab is also available in PDF.
Summary: In this laboratory, you will continue to explore the syntax and capabilities of the Scheme programming language.
Note: You may want to keep the corresponding reading at hand.
Start DrScheme and make sure that you're in Pretty Big Scheme mode. You may want to review the DrScheme lab to make sure you understand DrScheme.
a. Ask DrScheme to subtract 68343 from 81722.
b. Verify that the answer is correct.
a. Ask DrScheme to multiply 162 by 1383.
b. How would you verify that the answer is correct?
a. Ask DrScheme to add 3 and 4.
b. Ask DrScheme to add 3 and 4 and then add 5 to the result. You'll
need two calls to +
.
c. Ask DrScheme to add 3, 4, and 5 using only one call to +
.
d. What happens if you call the procedure +
with no arguments?
With only one? Why do you think it gives these results?
In the previous exercise, you explored what happens when you call the
procedure +
with zero and one arguments. Let us explore
the same questions for other procedures.
a. What do you expect to happen if you call the procedure *
with
one argument?
b. Verify your answer experimentally. If the results differ, try to explain the result Scheme gives.
c. What do you expect to happen if you call the procedure *
with
no arguments?
d. Verify your answer experimentally. If the results differ, try to explain the result Scheme gives.
e. What do you expect to happen if you call the procedure 
with
one argument?
f. Verify your answer experimentally. If the results differ, try to explain the result Scheme gives.
g. What do you expect to happen if you call the procedure 
with
no arguments?
h. Verify your answer experimentally. If the results differ, try to explain the result Scheme gives.
Have DrScheme compute the absolute value of 197. You can use the
abs
procedure.
a. Ask DrScheme to compute the cube of 19 (that is, the result of
raising 19 to the power 3). You can use expt
to compute
exponents.
b. Ask DrScheme to computer the nineteenth power of 3.
c. What do these results indicate about the relationship between procedures and arguments in Scheme?
As you've learned, Scheme expects you to use parentheses and prefix notation when writing expressions. What happens if you use more traditional mathematical notation? Let's explore that question.
Type each of the following expressions at the Scheme prompt and see what reaction you get.
(2 + 3)
7 * 9
sqrt(49)
You may wish to read the notes on this problem for an explanation of the results that you get.
a. Write a definition that will cause Scheme to recognize dozen
as a name for the number 12.
b. Write a definition that will cause Scheme to recognize
raisetopower
as a synonym for expt
.
c. Use both names in expressions to verify that Scheme has understood them.
a. What do you expect to happen when you ask DrScheme to compute the square root of 4?
b. Verify your answer experimentally.
c. What do your results suggest?
As you observed in the DrScheme lab, you can use the definitions pane to name values that you expect to use again (or that you simply find it more convenient to refer to with a mnemonic). So far, all we've named is simple values. However, you can also name the results of expressions.
a. In the definitions pane, write a definition that assigns the name
secondsperminute
to the value 60.
b. In the definitions pane, write a definition that assigns the name
minutesperhour
to the value 60.
c. In the definitions pane, write a definition that assigns the name
hoursperday
to the value 24.
d. In the definitions pane, write a definition that assigns the name
secondsperday
to the product of those three values. Note
that you should use the following expression to express that product.
(* secondsperminutes minutesperhour hoursperday)
e. Run your definitions and confirm in the interactions pane that secondsperday is defined correctly.
Let's play for a bit with how one might use DrScheme to compute grades.
(We teach you this, in part, so that you can figure out your estimated
grade in this class and others.) Let's define five names, grade1
through grade5
that potentially represent grades on five
homework assignments.
(define grade1 95) (define grade2 93) (define grade3 105) (define grade4 30) (define grade5 80)
Looking at those grades, you might observe that the student seems to have spent a bit of extra work on the third assignment, but that the extra work so disrupted the student's life that the next assignment was a disaster. (You may certainly analyze the grades differently.)
a. Write a definition that assigns the name averagegrade
to the average of the grades without dropping the highest and lowest
grades.
Many faculty members discard these outliers
, with a grading policy
of I take the average of your grades after dropping the highest grade
and the lowest grade
.
b. Write a definition that assigns the name highestgrade
to
a computed highest grade. (That is, highestgrade
should remain correct, even if I change the values associated with
grade1
through grade5
.) You may find the
max
procedure useful.
c. Write a definition that assigns the name lowestgrade
to a computed lowest grade. You may find the min
procedure useful.
d. Write a definition that assigns the name weightedaverage
to the weighed average grade (that is, the grade that results from dropping
the lowest and highest grades and then averaging the result).
Quit DrScheme and log out of the workstation.
(2 + 3)
When DrScheme sees the left parenthesis at the beginning of the expression
(2 + 3)
, it expects the expression to be a procedure call, and
it expects the procedure to be identified right after the left parenthesis.
But 2
does not identify a procedure; it stands for a number.
(A procedure application
is the same thing as a procedure call.)
7 * 9
In the absence of parentheses, DrScheme sees 7 * 9
as three
separate and unrelated expressions  the numeral 7
;
*
, a name for the primitive multiplication procedure; and
9
, another numeral. It interprets each of these as a command
to evaluate an expression: Compute the value of the numeral
So it performs the first of
these commands and displays 7
! Find out what the name *
stands for! Compute
the value of the numeral 9
!7
; then it carries out the second
command, reporting that *
is the name of the primitive
procedure *
; and finally it carries out the third command and
displays the result, 9
. This behavior is confusing, but it's
strictly logical if you look at it from the computer's point of view
(remembering, of course, that the computer has absolutely no common sense).
sqrt(49)
As in the preceding case, DrScheme sees sqrt(49)
as two
separate commands: sqrt
means Find out what
and sqrt
is!(49)
means Call the procedure
DrScheme responds to the first
command by reporting that 49
, with no arguments!sqrt
is the primitive procedure for
computing square roots and to the second by pointing out that the number
49
is not a procedure.
August 23, 1997 [John David Stone]
March 17, 2000 [John David Stone]
29 August 2000 [Samuel A. Rebelsky]
30 August 2000 [Samuel A. Rebelsky]
Thursday, 25 January 2001 [Samuel A. Rebelsky]
+
.
Wednesday, 4 September 2002 [Samuel A. Rebelsky]
http://www.cs.grinnell.edu/~rebelsky/Courses/CS151/2002F/Labs/beginningscheme.html
.
Tuesday, 21 January 2003 [Samuel A. Rebelsky]
http://www.cs.grinnell.edu/~rebelsky/Courses/CS153/2003S/Labs/beginningscheme.html
.
Friday, 5 September 2003 [Samuel A. Rebelsky]
Square Roots Revisited.
http://www.cs.grinnell.edu/~rebelsky/Courses/CS151/2003F/Labs/beginningscheme.html
.
Tuesday, 29 August 2006 [Samuel A. Rebelsky]
http://www.cs.grinnell.edu/~rebelsky/Courses/CS151/2006F/Labs/beginningscheme.html
.
[Skip to Body]
Primary:
[Front Door]
[Syllabus]
[Glance]
[Search]

[Academic Honesty]
[Instructions]
Current:
[Outline]
[EBoard]
[Reading]
[Lab]
[Homework]
Groupings:
[EBoards]
[Examples]
[Exams]
[Handouts]
[Homework]
[Labs]
[Outlines]
[Projects]
[Readings]
Reference:
[Scheme Report (R5RS)]
[Scheme Reference]
[DrScheme Manual]
Related Courses:
[CSC151.02 2006F (Davis)]
[CSCS151 2005S (Stone)]
[CSC151 2003F (Rebelsky)]
[CSC153 2004S (Rebelsky)]
Disclaimer:
I usually create these pages on the fly
, which means that I rarely
proofread them and they may contain bad grammar and incorrect details.
It also means that I tend to update them regularly (see the history for
more details). Feel free to contact me with any suggestions for changes.
This document was generated by
Siteweaver on Thu Nov 30 21:42:57 2006.
The source to the document was last modified on Wed Aug 30 09:36:59 2006.
This document may be found at http://www.cs.grinnell.edu/~rebelsky/Courses/CS151/2006F/Labs/beginningscheme.html
.
You may wish to validate this document's HTML ; ;
Samuel A. Rebelsky, rebelsky@grinnell.eduhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/2.5/
or send a letter to Creative Commons, 543 Howard Street, 5th Floor,
San Francisco, California, 94105, USA.